Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nexdine Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$377kEducation$71kHuman Services$49kRecreation & Sports$23kPhilanthropy$6kFood & Nutrition$5kCrime & Legal$3kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER$51,200
SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT$10,000
THE PEACE LOVE ALANNA FOUNDATION$8,000
CATHOLIC MEMORIAL HIGHT SCHOOL$6,400
BISHOP GUERTIN HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
BASS RIVER ROD & GUN CLUB$5,000
HAVA$3,500
SAINT MARY SACRED HEART SCHOOL$1,000
PROJECT JUST BECAUSE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE: $500 → 8%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE: $500 → 8%NEW HOPE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WI
MA
PA
NJ
RI
VA
MD
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$467k · 12 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$467k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+30%

Still filing today

50%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +95%
  • DI
    DANA-FARBER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $102k · revenue +207%
  • BR
    BASS RIVER ROD & GUN CLUB INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • HH
    HEBREW HOME FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CM
    CATHOLIC MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL OF WAUKESHA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • WH
    WESTBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Ocean State Cancer Crushers
—
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Friends of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Friends of dana-farber cancer institute supports the efforts of the dana-farber cancer institute.

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Cancer Prevention Initiative Inc

Cancer Prevention Initiative, Inc. (CPI) is a nonprofit corporation whose mission is to accelerate the discovery and development of new medicines that prevent cancer. CPI uses its research, medical and pharmaceutical expertise to invest in…

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
The Danbury Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
11
Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative

The mission of quantum leap healthcare collarborative is to provide management and financial support to healthcare research organizations, particularly involving breast cancer research and treatment.

Human Services
12
Debbie's Dream Foundation

Debbie's dream foundation:curing stomach cancer is dedicated to raising awareness about stomach cancer, providing education, advocacy, and support internationally to patients, families, and caregivers affected by the disease, and advancing…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JIMMY FUND DANA FARBER PEDIATRIC ADVANCED CARE UNIT: $113,850 · OtherJIMMY FUND DANA FARBER PEDIATRIC ADVANCED CARE UNITDANA-FARBER INC: $101,700 · OtherDANA-FARBER INCSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT: $35,000 · OtherSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENTHEBREW HOME FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherHEBREW HOME FOUNDATIONTHE PEACE LOVE ALANNA FOUNDATION: $17,400 · OtherBISHOP GUERTIN HIGH SCHOOL: $16,100 · OtherBASS RIVER ROD & GUN CLUB INC: $13,000 · Other+19 more: $59,841 · Other+19 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $150,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthRB FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationProject Just Because Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE INC: $500 · Human Services
Other$381,891Health$157,500Education$3,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $101,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBASS RIVER ROD & GUN CLUB INC: $13,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRB FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProject Just Because Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
  • Who funds BASS RIVER ROD & GUN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Just Because Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nexdine Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nexdine Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • New Hope Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Project Just Because Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nexdine’s filings →

More from the funding graph