Skip to content
The New World Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

The New World Foundation

To support community activists across america and around the world.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
95
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$5.4MEnvironment$5.1MEmployment$3.9MCommunity Improvement$3.1MInternational$1.7MPublic Benefit$1.5MArts & Culture$1.4MEducation$1.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 95 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 95 grants below total $8,165,532, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,856,791 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,691,259 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k62 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.8M
$22,500
Median grant
17
States reached
$233M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHARED CAPITAL COOPERATIVE$1,500,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$1,500,000
ICA FUND$800,000
JFFLABS INC$500,000
THE URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC$500,000
ICA FUND$500,000
PROJECT EQUITY$500,000
CHESTER AGRICULTURAL CENTER INC$130,000
ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC$100,000
THE NATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK$81,462
ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC$80,000
ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS$75,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$73,250
ROADMAP SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSULTING INC$60,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACTIVATE 48 EDUCATION FUND: $35k → 11%The City School Inc: $37k → 16%TRIBAL IMAGES MUSEUM INC: $25k → 7%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $67k → 18%FAMILY VALUES AT WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 17%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $58k → 14%THE CITY SCHOOL: $15k → 16%OAKWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 11%ARKANSAS UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION CO UNIV OF ARK SCHOOL OF LAW LEGAL: $15k → 14%ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20k → 17%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS: $75k → 21%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $40k → 18%FAMILY VALUES AT WORK A MULTISTATE CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 17%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $50k → 14%THE CITY SCHOOL INC: $15k → 16%Tides Center: $50k → 10%FAMILY VALUES AT WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 17%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $40k → 14%THE CITY SCHOOL INC: $25k → 12%ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $10k → 17%FAMILY VALUES AT WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM INC: $25k → 17%CARINA: $150k → 9%THE CITY SCHOOL INC: $20k → 12%TIDES FOUNDATION: $23k → 10%YMCA OF KINGSTON AND ULSTER COUNTY: $100k → 16%SISTER SONG INC: $10k → 13%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $50k → 14%THE CITY SCHOOL INC: $10k → 16%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $50k → 14%MASSACHUSETTS BAIL FUND INC: $10k → 8%THE CITY SCHOOL INC: $15k → 12%THE CITY SCHOOL INC: $10k → 16%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $50k → 14%DELIVERING GOODS INC: $50k → 17%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $50k → 17%DELIVERING GOOD: $50k → 17%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KINGSTON AND ULSTER COUNTY: $11k → 16%ONE COLORADO: $10k → 12%DELIVERING GOODS INC: $20k → 17%GOOD WORK INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 16%ONE COLORADO: $10k → 12%AYNI INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 16%Kids Fashion Delivers Inc: $10k → 17%KIDS FASHION DELIVERS INC: $10k → 17%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS ACTION FUND: $36k → 16%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS ACTION FUND INC: $25k → 16%TIDES FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The New World Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The New World Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 166 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

166 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 127 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

166
187

Total granted

$23M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+17%

Still filing today

90%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
EnvironmentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EV
    ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +177% · 25% of their budget
  • GI
    GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +189%
  • COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +443%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRESTAMOS CDFI LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $3.0M
  • CD
    COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT FUND OF CDSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +41% · 40% of their budget
  • BU
    Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -24% · 42% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
4
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
5
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
Western Resource Advocates

Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades,…

Crime & Legal
10
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
11
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
12
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boscobel Restoration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

432 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
112
Early backer (in before they grew)
421/432
Grantees still filing
248/432
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHARED CAPITAL COOP: $3,000,000 · OtherSHARED CAPITAL COOPPRESTAMOS CDFI LLC: $3,000,000 · OtherPRESTAMOS CDFI LLCENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC: $1,687,250 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC+110 more: $13,578,440 · Other+110 moreICAFUND: $1,300,000 · Community ImprovementICAFUNDPROJECT EQUITY: $500,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT EQ…Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc: $500,000 · Community ImprovementBaltimorea…COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $163,000 · Community Improvement+16 more: $941,000 · Community Improvement+16 moreGREENROOTS INC: $290,000 · EnvironmentNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $240,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC: $200,000 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $186,700 · EnvironmentHUDSON MOHAWK RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $175,000 · EnvironmentFOOD & WATER ACTION FUND: $165,000 · EnvironmentCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $100,000 · Environment+22 more: $1,054,098 · EnvironmentARIZONA WINS: $350,000 · Civil RightsNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS EDUCATION FUND INC: $230,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $225,000 · Civil RightsWORKERS DEFENSE ACTION FUND: $148,000 · Civil RightsFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc: $139,000 · Civil RightsSouthern Center for Human Rights: $131,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND: $125,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $106,000 · Civil RightsONE ARIZONA: $100,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $86,000 · Civil RightsCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · Civil Rights+13 more: $623,000 · Civil RightsHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $2,300,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,383,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $300,000 · InternationalTHE HYGEIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $100,000 · International+2 more: $82,500 · InternationalJFFLABS INC: $500,000 · EmploymentPER SCHOLAS INC: $280,000 · EmploymentHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $274,295 · EmploymentCOLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC: $240,000 · EmploymentWORKERS' DIGNITY PROJECT: $180,000 · EmploymentYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $140,000 · Employment+2 more: $96,000 · Employment
Other$21,265,690Community Improvement$3,404,000Environment$2,410,798Civil Rights$2,343,000Youth Development$2,300,000International$1,865,500Employment$1,710,295

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $2,300,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC: $1,687,250 over 8y, 25% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,383,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $500,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSEVEN STORIES INSTITUTE: $500,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetPROJECT EQUITY: $500,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT FUND OF CDS: $500,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetBaltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetHOMEFREE USA INC: $500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC: $425,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC: $405,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE: $375,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetARIZONA WINS: $350,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetCornell University: $333,670 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $306,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $300,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetGREENROOTS INC: $290,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $280,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $275,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $274,295 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetJOIN FREEWORLD INC: $250,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $247,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF ELIOT SCHOOL: $245,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $240,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCOLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC: $240,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS EDUCATION FUND INC: $230,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetURBAN REVIVAL INC: $225,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC: $200,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDELIVERING GOOD INC: $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRESIST INC: $189,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $186,700 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWORKERS' DIGNITY PROJECT: $180,000 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetHAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC: $180,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetRESILIENCE FORCE: $180,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHUDSON MOHAWK RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $175,000 over 1y, 86% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $174,998 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $173,078 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIndependent Media Institute: $170,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetRESILIENT POWER PUERTO RICO INC: $165,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFOOD & WATER ACTION FUND: $165,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE JANE STERN DORADO COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC: $165,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $163,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE INC: $152,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCarina: $150,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE ACTION FUND: $148,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetThe City School Inc: $146,500 over 9y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL VOTER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAFUND ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN STORIES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds JFFLABS INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT FUND OF CDS ↗
  • Who funds Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFREE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA WINS ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds GREENROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOIN FREEWORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF ELIOT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN REVIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DELIVERING GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds RESIST INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Rockefeller Family Fu…United States Energy …The Schmidt Family Fo…Windward FundProteus Fund IncNovo FoundationPatagoniaorgWorking Families Orga…Rsf Social Finance IncTides FoundationSolutions Project Inc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC69.6× affinity94 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · United States Energy Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Windward Fund · Proteus Fund Inc · Novo Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Working Families Organization Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Tides Foundation · Solutions Project Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The New World Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The New World Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 250%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Homefree Usa Inc: 54% of income from government
  • National Black Justice Coalition Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Community Service Care Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Rogue Climate: 7% of income from government
  • Salem Alliance for the Environment Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Spontaneous Celebrations Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Eliot School: 2% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Greenroots Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Community Labor United Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rethink Energy Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
25get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 415 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New World’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home