Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nelson & Beverly Kornstein Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$57kHealth$47kHousing & Shelter$22kFood & Nutrition$22kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$11kEnvironment$8kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Memorial Sloan Kettering$11,000
International Rescue Committee$6,000
Partners In Health$6,000
Community Food Bank$5,000
Family Promise$5,000
Save the Children Federation$3,000
Jewish Family Services$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Project Zawadi$2,000
Theater for the New City$2,000
Lebanon Valley Rails to Trails$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Beacon Sloop Club$1,000
NJ Friends of Clearwater$500
American Vegan Society$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Partners In Health: $6k → 16%Project Zawadi: $2k → 14%Legacy of Hope: $1k → 6%FREDERICKSBURG FIRE CO: $1k → 11%HB Studios: $3k → 17%Save the Children Federation: $3k → 9%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 4%Family Promise: $5k → 10%Partners In Health: $6k → 16%Project Zawadi: $2k → 14%Legacy of Hope: $1k → 6%Swatara Creek Watershed: $1k → 11%HB Studios: $3k → 17%Save the Children Federation: $3k → 9%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 4%Family Promise: $5k → 10%Partners In Health: $5k → 16%PROJECT ZAWADI: $2k → 14%Lebanon Valley Rails to Trails: $1k → 11%HB Studios: $3k → 17%Save the Children Federation: $3k → 9%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 4%Family Promise: $5k → 10%Partners In Health: $5k → 16%Project Zawadi: $2k → 14%Lebanon Valley Rails to Trails: $1k → 11%HB Studios: $3k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF: $2k → 4%Family Promise: $5k → 10%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $2k → 16%Project Zawadi: $2k → 14%SWARTARA CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 11%HB STUDIO: $1k → 17%FAMILY PROMISE: $2k → 10%Swatera Creek Watershed: $1k → 11%Theater for the New City: $2k → 17%Community Food Bank: $5k → 10%Community Food Bank: $5k → 10%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2k → 17%Community Food Bank: $5k → 10%Memorial Sloan Kettering: $11k → 17%Community Food Bank: $5k → 10%Memorial Sloan Kettering: $11k → 17%Memorial Sloan Kettering: $10k → 17%Memorial Sloan Kettering: $10k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $6k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $6k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Nelson & Beverly Kornstein Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Nelson & Beverly Kornstein Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$182k
$4k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $24k · revenue +33%
  • FAMILY PROMISE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +63%
  • CF
    Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • SC
    SWARTARA CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
2
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
3
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
4
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
5
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
6
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
7
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
8
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
9
Rethink Your Food Inc

Rethink Your Food advocates for the benefits of a plant-based diet and plant-focused food system as key solutions to advancing nutrition security, and mitigating environmental concerns and animal suffering. We collaborate with Caribbean…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
11
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Vegan Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Memorial Sloan Kettering: $44,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan KetteringIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJewish Family Services: $9,000 · OtherJewish Family ServicesTheater for the New City: $3,000 · Other+11 more: $12,500 · Other+11 morePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $24,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEA…LEGACY OF HOPE: $2,000 · HealthLEGACY OF HOPE+1 more: $500 · HealthInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 · InternationalInternational …Save The Children Federation Inc: $9,000 · InternationalSave The Child…FAMILY PROMISE INC: $22,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMIS…Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity F…PROJECT ZAWADI INC: $9,000 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY RAILS TO TRAILS INC: $4,000 · Community ImprovementBEACON SLOOP CLUB INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$80,500Health$26,500International$24,000Housing & Shelter$22,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$9,000Community Improvement$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ZAWADI INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY RAILS TO TRAILS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBEACON SLOOP CLUB INC: $3,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetLEGACY OF HOPE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VEGETARIAN RESOURCE GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ZAWADI INC ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY RAILS TO TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON SLOOP CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE VEGETARIAN RESOURCE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nelson & Beverly Kornstein Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nelson & Beverly Kornstein Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nelson & Beverly Kornstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph