Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Neely Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$357kHealth$147kHousing & Shelter$127kArts & Culture$6kEducation$6kYouth Development$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALS ASSOCIATION$20,000
SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM$20,000
OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION$15,000
RAPTOR TRUST$10,000
AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
THE HOBOKEN SHELTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%WILD CARE: $50k → 8%JAMES J MAHLBACHER '80: $5k → 11%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%BROOKLYN BALLET: $1k → 20%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $70k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%WE ARE BUILDING LIVES: $3k → 4%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA: $5k → 13%RAPTOR TRUST: $10k → 4%BERNARDS TOWNSHIP: $8k → 5%AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER: $10k → 6%STUDENTPARTNER ALLIANCE: $2k → 10%THE HOBOKEN SHELTER: $6k → 14%GARDEN ACADEMY: $5k → 16%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $50k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%RAPTOR TRUST: $7k → 4%BERNARDS TOWNSHIP: $5k → 5%AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER: $5k → 6%THE HOBOKEN SHELTER: $6k → 14%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $40k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%THE HOBOKEN SHELTER: $5k → 14%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $30k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $20k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $20k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%JUVENILE DIABETES: $5k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $20k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%ALS ASSOCIATION: $25k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $15k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%ALS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%SOUTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM: $10k → 12%OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%ALS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
MO
TN
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$597k · 10 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$597k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+8%

Still filing today

40%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    South Carolina Aquarium
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +72%
  • AU
    ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +28%
  • GA
    GARDEN ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILD CAREINCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +117%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +8%
  • JJ
    JAMES J MAHLBACHER '80
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
New York City Bird Alliance Inc

Nyc bird alliance is a grassroots community that protects wild birds and habitat in the five boroughs, improving the quality of life for all new yorkers.

Environment
3
Als Association Upstate New York Chapter Inc

To lead the fight to cure and treat als through global, cutting edge research and patient care.

—
4
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
5
Bionj Inc

Bionj, inc. is a powerful network of 400 member companies representing research-based life sciences companies and stakeholders. because patients can't wait, we are dedicated to propelling the rich innovation ecosystem in the new jersey…

—
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
New York Cardiac Center Inc

The mission of the new york cardiac center is to be a part of the ongoing effort to diagnose and prevent heart and other diseases. we help to develop treatment for those who need it and assist in training new scientists, educators, and…

—
8
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
9
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
10
Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health
11
Als United North Carolina

To discover treatments and a cure for als and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.

Health
12
Cure Rare Disease Inc

Our mission is to enable and finance the development of life-saving genetic medicines for ultra-rare patient populations previously deemed too rare to treat. to realize this, our unique ecosystems facilitates collaboration between…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Raptor Trust; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

South Carolina Aquarium: $275,000 · AnimalsSouth Carolina AquariumWILD CAREINC: $50,000 · AnimalsWILD CAREINCTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $17,000 · AnimalsOUR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $110,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE FOUNDATIONALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC: $105,000 · OtherALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INCJUVENILE DIABETES: $35,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETESTHE HOBOKEN SHELTER: $17,000 · OtherTHE HOBOKEN SHELTERAVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · Other+4 more: $13,500 · OtherGARDEN ACADEMY INC: $6,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROOKLYN BALLETINC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · Health
Animals$342,000Other$308,000Education$6,000Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouth Carolina Aquarium: $275,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWILD CAREINC: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $17,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGARDEN ACADEMY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BALLETINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds South Carolina Aquarium ↗
  • Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD CAREINC ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BALLETINC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Neely Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Neely Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neely Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph