· Private foundation
The Neelima & Mukul Parikh Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $2k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLV | $75,000 |
| United Way OF THE CAPITAL REGION | $30,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS | $10,000 |
| OTHER VARIOUS CHARITIES | $1,466 |
| Vialista Foundation Inc | $500 |
| BE HAPPY INC | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUnited Way4× · 2017–2020 · $404k
- UWUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLV5× · 2021–2025 · $300k
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE CAPITAL REGION5× · 2021–2025 · $211k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- OMOPERATION MEDICALgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +43%
- AIALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +19%
- SRSRI RAM SAMSTHAN INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +178%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary work in the nation of India
Aid to poor students, organization of eye camps, safe drinking waterAid to poor students, organization of eye camps, and arrangement of safe drinking waters.
The very essence of spirituality and religion lies in understanding the depth of ancient wisdom, connecting to the divine, and achieving inner peace. our organization, rooted in the profound teachings of vedic scriptures and the practice…
Relegious and spiritual worship.
To disseminate teachings of self-realization through incorporating the basic principles of the philosophy of spiritual teachers and other ecumenical saints from varied traditions and to provide humanitarian efforts around the globe
Public education
Foster & protect the religious diversity and pluralism, protecting, preserving, rejuvenating and disseminating information about non aggressive religious traditions
The Corporation is organized exclusively for religious, charitable, cultural and educational purposes to promote the teachings of Sanatan Hindu Dharma. Inspiration to create this organization comes from teachings of H.H. 1008 Swami Shri…
Religious worship daily poojas and festi
Isso conduct religious services and activities following the teachings and principles of swaminarayan sect of a hindu religion founded and ordained by lord shri sahajanand swami, also known as lord swaminarayan.
International eye foundation works to prevent blindness and restore sight by building capacity for quality, comprehensive and sustainable eye care services worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All India Movement for Seva Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CAPITAL REGION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION MEDICAL ↗
- Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC ↗
- Who funds SRI RAM SAMSTHAN INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BE HAPPY INC ↗
- Who funds ISKCON OF HARRISBURG ↗
- Who funds BLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Neelima & Mukul Parikh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.