· Private foundation
The Nathan J & Helen Goldrich Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of THE NATHAN J & HELEN GOLDRICH FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k36 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION KOL AMI | $5,125 |
| HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS | $5,000 |
| HSMAI FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SECOND HEARTS HOMES | $3,500 |
| MARIE SEZBY BOTANICAL GARDENS | $3,500 |
| PKD FOUNDATION | $3,250 |
| AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| SARASOTA BALLET | $2,500 |
| SARASOTA OPERA | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| ASOLO REPERTORY THEATRE | $2,500 |
| HAVEN | $2,000 |
| ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +112%- SHSETTLEMENT HOUSING FUND INC4× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +93%
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- CCCONGREGATION CHABAD INREACH ALIYAone grant, 2023 · $10k
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%- HSHONOR SANCTUARY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.
The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Athens Area Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is James Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SETTLEMENT HOUSING FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Gather ↗
- Who funds OCONEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds DOVER CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
- Who funds Sarasota Ballet of Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds Sarasota Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKE OCONEE YOUTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds ASOLO THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds HONOR SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds SECOND HEART HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds THANKS TO SCANDINAVIA INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Banksouth Foundation Ltd · Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Manatee County Inc · Greater Rochester Community Health Foundation · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Greater Good Charities · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nathan J & Helen Goldrich Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Willowell Foundation Inc — 28% of income from government
- The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — 0% of income from government
- Cat Depot — 0% of income from government
- Florida Studio Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Nathan J & Helen Goldrich Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Nathan J & Helen Goldrich Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.