Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nancy & Peter Thauer Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$64kArts & Culture$9kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$3kHuman Services$2kAnimals$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$129k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENYON COLLEGE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SOCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION$2,000
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$2,000
RAMAPO COLLEGE$2,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED INC$1,000
THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL$1,000
KENT SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%SMITH COLLEGE: $2k → 12%THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $2k → 22%SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $1k → 7%CASA FJD: $2k → 9%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%DUCKS UNLIMITED INC: $1k → 17%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%FASF BARNSTABLE: $1k → 7%BLAIR ACADEMY: $3k → 7%THE OAK KNOLL SCHOLL: $3k → 10%THE LAWRENCEVILLE FUND: $2k → 11%SMITH COLLEGE: $2k → 12%THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $1k → 22%SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $1k → 7%KENT SCHOOL: $2k → 9%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%RAMAPO COLLEGE: $3k → 7%BLAIR ACADEMY: $1k → 7%THE OAK KNOLL SCHOLL: $3k → 10%THE LAWRENCEVILLE FUND: $1k → 11%SMITH COLLEGE: $2k → 12%THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $1k → 22%KENT SCHOOL: $1k → 9%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%RAMAPO COLLEGE: $2k → 7%BLAIR ACADEMY: $1k → 7%THE OAK KNOLL SCHOLL: $2k → 10%SMITH COLLEGE: $2k → 12%THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $1k → 22%KENT SCHOOL: $1k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%SOCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $2k → 7%BLAIR ACADEMY: $1k → 7%THE OAK KNOLL SCHOLL: $1k → 10%THE SMITH FUND: $1k → 12%THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $1k → 22%KENT SCHOOL: $1k → 9%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%BLAIR ACADEMY: $1k → 7%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%KENYON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL: $3k → 22%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL: $3k → 22%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL: $3k → 22%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL: $2k → 22%SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
MD
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Nancy & Peter Thauer Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 28% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Nancy & Peter Thauer Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 12 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -77% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$90k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-77%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KENYON COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +23%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • TP
    THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • TS
    THE SMITH FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
9
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
12
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kent School; the most unlike its peers is Saved Me Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENYON COLLEGE: $14,000 · EducationKENYON COLLEGETHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGEKENT SCHOOL: $8,500 · EducationKENT SCHOOLFairfield University: $7,500 · EducationFairfield UniversityBLAIR ACADEMY: $6,750 · EducationBLAIR ACADEMYSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $9,250 · OtherTHE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOLTHE OAK KNOLL SCHOLL: $9,000 · OtherTHE OAK KNOLL SCHOLLRAMAPO COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherRAMAPO COLLEGETHE LAWRENCEVILLE FUND: $2,500 · OtherTHE LAWRENCEVILLE FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $2,100 · OtherSOCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Other+4 more: $4,000 · Other+4 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,000 · HealthDucks Unlimited Inc: $1,000 · Environment
Education$48,750Other$45,850Health$3,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $9,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKENT SCHOOL: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLAIR ACADEMY: $6,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KENT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds BLAIR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAVED ME INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nancy & Peter Thauer Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nancy & Peter Thauer Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Blair Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nancy & Peter Thauer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph