Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
60%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 12
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$303k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 60% of the organizations The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 77% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving15$34k47%
FY202310$18k60%
FY202212$16kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$91kHealth$22kInternational$17kAnimals$12kReligion$7kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$250Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($15k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLupus Research Alliance Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Magen David Adom: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEpi4dogs Foundation Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetNorth Shore Animal League America Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTable to Table Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWounded Warrior Project Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Pleasant Animal Shelter Inc: $2,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGuiding Eyes for the Blind Inc: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGift of Life Marrow Registry Inc: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Humane Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marla Sue Golden Philanthropic Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadison Rose Fund for Therapeutic Riding: $500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLivingston First Aid Squad Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust

How much does The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust give?
The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust reported 16 grants totaling $54,139 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 12 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (58%), Health (14%), International (11%).
Who are The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Lupus Research Alliance Inc ($13k), American Friends of Magen David Adom ($8k), Jewish National Fund-Usa Inc ($4k).
Does The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust based?
The Nagel-Goodman Foundation Trust is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nagel-Goodman’s filings →

More from the funding graph