Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mynydd Teg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$505kArts & Culture$112kHealth$104kHousing & Shelter$45kReligion$42kFood & Nutrition$19kYouth Development$6kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$16,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$22,000
PELOTONIA$20,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$16,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$15,000
NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST VINCENT HAVEN: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$730k · 7 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$730k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+37%

Still filing today

29%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OU
    OHIO UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $173k
  • TO
    THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $147k
  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $130k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +68%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
3
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

4
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

6
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

7
Ohio Housing Council

To advocate and educate on behalf of our members to increase the quality and supply of affordable housing in the state of ohio, and to provide our members with current legislative awareness, a forum for voicing legislative and programmatic…

Community Improvement
8
Columbus Regional Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence

To work towards the prevention and elimination of domestic and dating violence.

9
The Affordable Housing Trust for Columbus and Franklin County

Facilitate and invest in developments designed to: create and preserve affordable homeownership and rental housing; strengthen and stabilize neighborhoods; support working households, seniors and special needs populations.

Housing & Shelter
10
Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights
11
Ohio Living Communities

See schedule oohio living communities was founded in 1922 and was incorporated as an ohio non-profit corporation in 1959. the corporation's mission statement is as follows:our mission is to provide older adults with caring and quality…

Human Services
12
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Licking County Coalition for Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Vincent De Paul Housing Facilities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OHIO UNIVERSITY — $173,000 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $147,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYMARSHALL UNIVERSITY — $130,000 · OtherMARSHALL UNIVERSITYTHE LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION — $102,000 · OtherTHE LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATIONNATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $84,000 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION+5 more — $22,000 · OtherTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY — $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WORKS …PELOTONIA — $20,000 · EducationST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY — $14,000 · Food & NutritionST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentLICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$698,000Arts & Culture$80,000Education$30,000Food & Nutrition$14,000Human Services$10,000Youth Development$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY — $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPELOTONIA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY — $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds PELOTONIA
  • Who funds THE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO
  • Who funds LICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lindorf Family FoundationOH17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lindorf Family Foundation · Licking County Foundation Inc · Park National Corporation Foundation · The Lefevre Foundation · The O'Neill Foundation · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation · Denison University · The John and Mary Alford Foundation · The Englefield Foundation · First Federal Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mynydd Teg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • St John's College2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mynydd Teg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Mynydd Teg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph