Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mr and Mrs Joe W Bratcher Jr Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$413k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$640kHealth$516kFood & Nutrition$367kInternational$215kAnimals$194kRecreation & Sports$99kHousing & Shelter$98kEnvironment$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $223k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$11,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ST DAVIDS FOUNDATION$30,000
THE SETON FUND$30,000
PIONEER FARMS$25,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$25,000
EQUINE CUSHING'S AND INSULIN RESISTANCE GROUP$20,000
HOSPICE AUSTIN$20,000
AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION$15,000
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$15,000
KUT$11,500
KCRW FOUNDATION$11,500
AUSTIN HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $20k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $20k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $20k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $20k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $20k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $20k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $17k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 20 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$50k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $209k · revenue +85%
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $138k · revenue +8%
  • HA
    HOSPICE AUSTIN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $137k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
2
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
3
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
4
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Central Texas Palliative Care Associates Dba Austin Palliative Care

Austin palliative care provides medical director services to hospice austin as well as palliative care to patients who are not yet admitted to hospice programs.

Health
7
Hermann Park Conservancy

Hermann Park Conservancy is a citizens organization dedicated to the stewardship and improvement of Hermann Park - today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Charlotte Center City Partners

Charlotte center city partners (cccp) boldly envisions and activates strategies and actions that will assure charlotte center city is a welcoming and equitable, economically vibrant, culturally rich and beloved place for all.

—
9
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
10
Austin Community Foundation Inc

We mobilize ideas and resources to strengthen central texas.

Philanthropy
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St David's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kamukama Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $509,340 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SETON FUND: $208,750 · OtherTHE SETON FUNDPIONEER FARMS: $148,500 · OtherPIONEER FARMSIndividual grant recipient: $138,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEQUINE CUSHING'S AND INSULIN RESISTANCE GROUP: $120,000 · OtherEQUINE CUSHING'S AND INSULIN RESISTANCE GROUPCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $97,750 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTINKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $80,500 · OtherKUT: $80,500 · Other+5 more: $196,625 · Other+5 moreST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $208,750 · HealthST DAVID'S…Central Texas Food Bank Inc: $137,750 · Food & NutritionHOSPICE AUSTIN: $137,250 · Human ServicesAUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION: $98,500 · Recreation & SportsPease Park Conservancy: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $55,000 · AnimalsOPERATION SMILE INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalKAMUKAMA FOUNDATION: $6,000 · International
Other$1,580,715Health$208,750Food & Nutrition$137,750Human Services$137,250Recreation & Sports$118,500Animals$55,000International$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $208,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $137,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $137,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION: $98,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $97,750 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $80,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTreeFolks Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPease Park Conservancy: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAMUKAMA FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TreeFolks Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pease Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds KAMUKAMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mr and Mrs Joe W Bratcher Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mr and Mrs Joe W Bratcher Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mr and Mrs Joe W Bratcher Jr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mr and Mrs Joe W Bratcher Jr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mr and Mrs Joe W Bratcher Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph