Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Moyer Community Foundation

To provide support for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or education purposes within and for the direct or indirect benefit of the community (city and environs) of powell, wyoming.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$104kHousing & Shelter$80kRecreation & Sports$78kCommunity Improvement$69kHealth$63kFood & Nutrition$29kEnvironment$25kHuman Services$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POWELL VALLEY RECYCLING$25,000
CITY OF POWELL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YOUTH CLUBS OF PARK COUNTY$2,500
POWELL BOXING CLUB$1,813
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 9 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +692% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$378k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+692%
+39%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YOUTH CLUBS OF PARK COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +19%
  • PM
    POWELL MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $48k · revenue +692% · 40% of their budget
  • MS
    Mountain Spirit Habitat for Humanity
    3× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • PC
    PARK COUNTY COURT TREATMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $17k
  • CO
    CITY OF POWELL GOLF COURSE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • CI
    CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Powell County Medical Foundation

To provide funding for numerous rural medical community needs:

—
2
Park County Environmental Council

PCEC works with our community to safeguard the land, water, wildlife, and people of Yellowstone's northern gateway through grassroots organizing and community advocacy.

Environment
3
Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii
Health
4
Valley County Economic Develop Dba West Central Mtn Eco Develo

Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region

Community Improvement
5
Wyoming Valley Health & Education Foundation
—
6
Pivotal Health & Wellness Inc

Provide healthcare services and resources to courtland kansas and the surrounding rural communities.

Health
7
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
8
Pocatello Free Clinic

Our mission is to provide free interdisciplinary health and wellness care to the underserved popultion of our community while also providing an effective training environment for future healthcare professionals and leaders dedicated to…

—
9
Powder Basin Watershed Council

To facilitate community-supported maintenance and restoration of the streams, rivers, and lakes within our watershed.

Environment
10
Pocatello Chubbuck Chamber of Comme

Local chamber of commerce for the pocatello chubbuck area.

—
11
Pawnee Valley Community Hospital Foundation

This foundation is established to provide support for the activities and misson of pawnee valley community hospital, inc ("pvch) in pvch's efforts to provide for the healthcare and wellness needs of the citizens of pawnee county, ks.

Health
12
Poudre Valley Health Care Inc

We improve lives. in big ways through learning, healing and discovery. in small, personal ways through human connection. but in all ways, we improve lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Powell Valley Health Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOWELL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $48,198 · OtherPOWELL MEDICAL FOUNDATIONPOWELL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FOUNDAT: $38,489 · OtherPOWELL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATCITY OF POWELL: $34,718 · OtherCITY OF POWELLMountain Spirit Habitat for Humanity: $30,000 · OtherMountain Spirit Habitat for HumanityBACKPACK BLESSINGS: $28,800 · OtherBACKPACK BLESSINGSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF PARK CO: $17,500 · OtherPARK COUNTY COURT TREATMENT: $17,000 · OtherCITY OF POWELL GOLF COURSE: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $57,509 · Other+10 moreYOUTH CLUBS OF PARK COUNTY INC: $70,300 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH CLUBS OF…POWELL VALLEY RECYCLING: $25,000 · EnvironmentPOWELL HEALTH CARE COALITION: $10,000 · HealthPOWELL VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $4,694 · HealthCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $10,970 · Human ServicesPOWELL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $9,000 · Community ImprovementPOWELL SWIM CLUB: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $6,753 · Education
Other$387,214Youth Development$70,300Environment$25,000Health$14,694Human Services$10,970Community Improvement$9,000Recreation & Sports$8,000Education$6,753

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH CLUBS OF PARK COUNTY INC: $70,300 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetPOWELL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $48,198 over 2y, 40% of budgetMountain Spirit Habitat for Humanity: $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPOWELL VALLEY RECYCLING: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $10,970 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPOWELL HEALTH CARE COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOWELL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $9,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPOWELL SWIM CLUB: $8,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $6,753 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOWELL VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $4,694 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH CLUBS OF PARK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds POWELL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Spirit Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds POWELL VALLEY RECYCLING ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds POWELL HEALTH CARE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds POWELL ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds POWELL SWIM CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds POWELL VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moyer Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moyer Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Moyer Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Moyer Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moyer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph