Skip to content
The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter at a glance

· Private foundation

The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$829k
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$246k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$3.8MHuman Services$1.9MEducation$601kInternational$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kScience & Tech$3kRecreation & Sports$1kHealth$680
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $598k
$2,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE$245,700
YESHIVA BAIS AHARON$97,500
FRIENDS OF BRISKER YESHIVA$75,000
YESHIVA AND MESIVTA KEREN HATORAH$64,100
BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL$60,250
CHEDER TORAS ZEV$55,600
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CONGREGATION CHEYE OLOM INC$29,340
AGUDATH ISRAEL$20,000
CONGREGATION MINYAN MIR$16,570
Individual grant recipient$16,000
BAIS SHAINDEL HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$15,000
CONGREGATION CHASAM SIFER INC$15,000
CONGREGATION SONS OF JUDAH$13,570
Individual grant recipient$12,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%SIMCHAS SARAH: $180 → 20%MISASKIM: $4k → 20%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 62 repeat orgs$725k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

62 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
48

Total granted

$5.7M
$615k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
-12%

Still filing today

16%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHEDER TORAS ZEV
    8× · 2017–2024 · $256k · revenue +394%
  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +58%
  • BS
    BAIS SHAINDEL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • CT
    CONGREGATION TZDOKAH VCHESED INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $154k
  • BM
    BEER MORDECHAI INC
    one grant, 2023 · $110k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LAYELED
    one grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
8
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
9
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
10
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
11
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
12
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel; the most unlike its peers is Keren Sarah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $1,279,300 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHAYESHIVA AND MESIVTA KEREN HATORAH: $561,500 · OtherYESHIVA AND MESIVTA KEREN HATORAHFRIENDS OF THE BRISKER YESHIVA INC: $545,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE BRISKER YESHIVA INCBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INC: $478,800 · OtherBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INCCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE: $442,580 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHECONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY: $278,000 · Other+103 more: $2,064,155 · Other+103 moreCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $256,495 · EducationCHEDER TORA…YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $115,175 · EducationYESHIVA TOR…BAIS SHAINDEL: $107,875 · EducationBAIS SHAIND…BAIS TOVA INC: $49,500 · EducationBAIS TOVA I…YESHIVA HEICHAL HATORAH INC: $48,600 · EducationYESHIVA HEI…SHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $33,650 · EducationASHIRA PROGRAM INC: $23,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $30,500 · ReligionANIYEI YERUSHALAYIM INC: $13,600 · ReligionYESHIVA OF OCEAN INC: $4,700 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BETH JACOB TEACHERS INSTITUTE OF JERUSALEM: $23,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC: $10,000 · InternationalCHASDEI RIVKA ROCHEL INC: $25,135 · PhilanthropyMISASKIM CORP: $4,600 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,800 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $180 · Human ServicesMYE CHESED FUND INC: $680 · Health
Other$5,649,335Education$635,295Religion$49,800International$33,000Philanthropy$25,135Human Services$7,080Health$680

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $256,495 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $115,175 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBETH HATALMUD RABBINICAL INSTITUTE: $110,730 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetBAIS SHAINDEL: $107,875 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC: $49,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA HEICHAL HATORAH INC: $48,600 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LAYELED: $36,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $33,650 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $30,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCHASDEI RIVKA ROCHEL INC: $25,135 over 8y, 39% of budgetASHIRA PROGRAM INC: $23,000 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetANIYEI YERUSHALAYIM INC: $13,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVA OF OCEAN INC: $4,700 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $4,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMYE CHESED FUND INC: $680 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMCHAS SARAH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH HATALMUD RABBINICAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL ↗
  • Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA HEICHAL HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LAYELED ↗
  • Who funds SHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundDonors Fund IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…Toras Chesed IncZichron Yechiel Meche…National Society for …Regina Goldwasser Fou…Zichron Chaim Charity…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Harry H Beren Foundat…
The Ojc FundNY67.8× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Toras Chesed Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Harry H Beren Foundation Ig

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 22% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter?

Find your warmest path to The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home