Skip to content
The Moses M and Hannah L Malkin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Moses M and Hannah L Malkin Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$375k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JEWISH STUDIES$25,000
THE HILLEL FOUNDATION$25,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$25,000
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$25,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$25,000
BRIDGES MENTAL HEALTH$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,000
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAVEN CT$25,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SOCIAL WORK SCHOOL$25,000
URBAN COLLEGE OF BOSTON$15,000
AQUINNAH GAYHEAD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$10,000
SMILE TRAIN INC$10,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$10,000
MARTHA'S VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CARIDAD CENTER: $10k → 11%AQUINNAH GAYHEAD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
KY
AZ
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Urban College of Boston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $25,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JEWISH STUDIES: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JEWISH STUDIESJEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAVEN CT: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAVEN CTPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SOCIAL WORK SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SOCIAL WORK SCHOOLBRIDGES MENTAL HEALTH: $25,000 · OtherBRIDGES MENTAL HEALTHCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $10,000 · OtherB'NAI BRITH ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $10,000 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNAT…PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: $10,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR S…Mercy Corps: $10,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $25,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO CO…Urban College Of Boston: $15,000 · EducationUrban College O…BEREA COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationBEREA COLLEGESOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $25,000 · ReligionCaridad Center Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesAquinnah Community Association Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$190,000International$55,000Education$50,000Crime & Legal$25,000Religion$25,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUrban College Of Boston: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMercy Corps: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAquinnah Community Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moses M and Hannah L Malkin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moses M and Hannah L Malkin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moses M and Hannah L Malkin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home