Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morris Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.6MHuman Services$960kEducation$850kPublic Safety & Disaster$800kInternational$400kYouth Development$270kAnimals$252kCrime & Legal$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $726k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$300,000
MAYO CLINIC$125,926
TEAM RUBICON$100,000
SALVATION ARMY$100,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100,000
OHHSCHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$50,000
PREVENT CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$50,000
WWHS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE$50,000
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST$50,000
LIFESKILLS RANCH PROGRAM$50,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO$25,000
DEV MISSION$25,000
HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT$25,000
PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $880k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EDDY HOUSE: $20k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $50k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
NV
CA
WV
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 14 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$4.4M
$355k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-34%

Still filing today

79%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2024 · $800k · revenue +38%
  • Southern Methodist University
    2× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +3%
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • VF
    VOTE FORWARD
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -35%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • MI
    Music In Schools Today
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monterey Bay Dart

Drone, Aviation, and Robotics Technology (DART) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) to support quality job growth and community vitality. DART's mission is to…

Science & Tech
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Swords to Plowshares Veterans Rights Organization

Swords to plowshares' mission is to heal the wounds of war, to restore dignity, hope and self-sufficiency to all veterans in need, and to significantly reduce homelessness and poverty among veterans.

Public Benefit
4
Goodwill Industries of New Mexico

Goodwills mission is to provide skills training, job development and social services for new mexicans. goodwill's vision is that new mexicans will have the opportunity to improve their lives by utilizing goodwill's services and…

Employment
5
Lifemoves

Lifemoves provides interim housing and supportive services for homeless families and individuals to rapidly return to stable housing and achieve long-term self-sufficiency.

—
6
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
7
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
8
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
9
Hire Heroes Usa Inc

Hire heroes usa empowers u.s. military members, veterans and military spouses to succeed in the civilian workforce. as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, hire heroes usa's services are provided at no cost to the client.

Education
10
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
11
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Npower Inc

Npower is a national nonprofit that unlocks economic mobility by preparing young adults and military-connected individuals - especially those facing barriers to opportunity - for high-demand careers in the technology sector through…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Rubicon Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lifeskills Ranch Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $2,245,936 · HealthMAYO CLINICANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $325,000 · HealthANGEL FLIGHT WEST INCLIFESKILLS RANCH PROGRAM INC: $300,000 · HealthLIFESKILLS RANCH PROGRAM INCSALVATION ARMY: $600,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYOHHSCHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $250,000 · OtherOHHSCHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONVOTE FORWARD: $200,000 · OtherVOTE FORWARDWWHS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherWWHS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO GREATER MODESTO INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY N: $200,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER …DEV MISSION: $125,000 · OtherDEV MISSION+2 more: $35,000 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $800,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Natio…PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA VOLU…+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesSouthern Methodist University: $600,000 · EducationSouthern Me…HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $125,000 · EducationHIDDEN GENI…TEAM RUBICON INC: $400,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPREVENT CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (PVCA): $251,500 · AnimalsIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $250,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$2,870,936Other$1,610,000Human Services$880,000Education$725,000Public Safety & Disaster$400,000Animals$251,500Crime & Legal$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $2,245,936 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $800,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $400,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $325,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetLIFESKILLS RANCH PROGRAM INC: $300,000 over 6y, 96% of budgetPREVENT CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (PVCA): $251,500 over 5y, 57% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $250,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO GREATER MODESTO INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY N: $200,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetVOTE FORWARD: $200,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetDEV MISSION: $125,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $125,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMusic In Schools Today: $25,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESKILLS RANCH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds PREVENT CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (PVCA) ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO GREATER MODESTO INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY N ↗
  • Who funds VOTE FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds DEV MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Music In Schools Today ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morris Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morris Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morris’ filings →

    More from the funding graph