Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morgan McClain Family Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$68kYouth Development$55kReligion$44kHuman Services$43kArts & Culture$21kEducation$19kPhilanthropy$15kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$9,301
DOERNBECHER$7,500
NATIONS FOUNDATION$5,000
HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$5,000
PROJECT CHAMBER MUSIC$3,000
SALEM DREAM CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $1k → 14%LIBERTY HOUSE: $5k → 14%LIBERTY HOUSE: $5k → 14%LIBERTY HOUSE: $5k → 14%LIBERTY HOUSE: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $3k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $3k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $3k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE & SAFETY: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$313k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$313k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+132%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LIBERTY HOUSE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • Southern Methodist University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +3%
  • SD
    SALEM DREAM CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SC
    SISTERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • B
    BLANCHET
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +132%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Salem Health

To improve the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

Health
2
Willamette Family Medical Center Inc

Providing health care services

Health
3
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
4
The Oregon Community Foundation

The mission of The Oregon Community Foundation is to improve lives of all Oregonians through the power of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
5
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Portland

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

—
6
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
7
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
8
Hope for the Homeless Foundation

To identify and financially partner with organizations in the portland area that are successfully helping men, women, and children gain stability in their lives so they are no longer homeless.

Human Services
9
Legacy Health Foundation

Legacy Health Foundation (LHF) was incorporated on August 21, 2013. The mission of the foundation is to foster charitable giving as well as community commitment and involvement to support the founding principles, mission and vision of…

Health
10
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
11
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center

Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center (LMHMC) was founded in 1922 and is a community hospital in Gresham, Oregon with 115 licensed beds. LMHMC offers a wide range of services including family birth, diagnostic services, cancer treatment,…

Health
12
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital

Legacy Meridian Park Hospital (LMPH), established in 1973, is a community hospital in Tualatin, OR, south of Portland with 150 licensed beds. LMPH serves the needs of the fast growing communities of Tualatin, Tigard, Wilsonville, Sherwood,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Southern Methodist University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $57,500 · OtherDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $55,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherNATIONS FOUNDATIONPROJECT CHAMBER MUSIC: $18,000 · OtherPROJECT CHAMBER MUSICUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $14,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $12,500 · Other+4 more: $9,500 · OtherLIBERTY HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesLIBERTY HO…CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $9,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSouthern Methodist University: $19,301 · EducationSALEM DREAM CENTER: $11,000 · Food & NutritionHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE SALEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropySISTERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$251,500Human Services$30,500Education$19,301Food & Nutrition$11,000Health$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $57,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY HOUSE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $19,301 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM DREAM CENTER: $11,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SALEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds SALEM DREAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SALEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Salem Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Evergreen Charitable Trust · W Walton Decd Charitable Trust · Pioneer Trust Bank Na Foundation · Gelco Charitable Foundation · Marion-Polk Food Share Inc · The Ford Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morgan McClain Family Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morgan McClain Family Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Center for Hope and Safety: 68% of income from government
  • Liberty House: 23% of income from government
  • United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Morgan McClain Family Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Morgan McClain Family Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morgan McClain Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph