How much did THE MORDECAI & ELINOR GABRIEL grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of THE MORDECAI & ELINOR GABRIEL’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

chathammillburn-short hills

2019

millburn-short hills

2020

animal

2021

leagueharvardanimal

2022

animalwelfare

2023

harvard

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500

Median grant

States reached

$73k

Total assets

Largest grants

NEW YORK GILBERT & SULLIVAN PLAYERS$2,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE LIFETOWN$1,000
FRIENDS OF NOBSKA LIGHTHOUSE$1,000
WOODS HOLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$800
SMILE TRAIN$750
HARVARD COLLEGE FUND$650
WQXR PUBLIC RADIO$600
INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$600
NJTV PUBLIC TELEVISION$600
CARMEN GUARINO CLASSIC$500
MEGAN DAVID ADOM$500
FRIENDS OF LINDEN ANIMAL SHELTER$250
CHILDREN'S SCHOOL OF SCIENCE$250
FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER$200
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$62k · 35 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$62k

$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%

+46%

Still filing today

31%

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NY
NEW YORK GILBERT & SULLIVAN PLAYERS
8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +26%
WH
WOODS HOLE PUBLIC LIBRARY
8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +128%
CS
CHILDREN'S SCHOOL OF SCIENCE
8× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +44%

Funded once

FF
FDR FOUNDATION (HARVARD UNIVERSITY)
one grant, 2017 · $1k
JA
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL
one grant, 2023 · $1k
NT
NATIONAL TAY-SACHS ASSOCIATIONS
one grant, 2023 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Humane Society of Marlboro County Inc

Sheltering, providing care for and finding permanent placement for animals in need.

Animals

Friends of the Scituate Shelter Inc

Provide adoption assitance and veterinary care and grooming for impounded or lost animals. maintain and upkeep the scituate animal shelter. thousands of animals adopted to date.

Human Services

Dogs in Danger Rescue Inc

A small rescue group operating in the new york area that only rescues dogs from high kill shelters and southern rescues. this means a majority of dogs admitted there are euthanized due to lack of space. we very rarely take in owner…

Animals

Animal Welfare Society of Monroe

The animal welfare society of monroe (awsom) provides shelter and medical care for companion animals so they are free from abuse, hunger, fear, and lonliness, until placing them in responsible, forever homes.

Animals

Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to improving the lives of animals in its community and beyond. daws provides rescue,shelter and care to cats & dogs in need and offers adoption counseling

Animals

Animal Welfare Society of

The organization provides health and welfare care for abandoned animals through its no-kill animal shelter to homeless puppies, kittens, dogs and cats as well as spay-neuter, inoculation, and adoption services.

Animals

Woods Humane Society Inc

To serve, protect and shelter homeless companion animals; to place animals into humane environments; to promote responsible pet ownership, provide humane education, and reduce animal overpopulation; and to celebrate the human-animal bond.

Animals

Meals-On-Wheels Inc

To provide meals to the elderly, sick & disabled in the town of greenwich, ct

—

Humane Society of Warren County Inc

The humane society of warren county is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing compassionate care to abandoned, abused, homeless and neglected animals in our community. we aim to educate pet owners on the importance of…

Animals

Logans Run Rescue

Logans run rescue is an animal rescue organization whose purpose is to provide foster care, medical care and temperament training and to find qualified homes and to rescue animals in need. in addition, the organization provides low cost…

Animals

Worcester Animal Rescue League Inc

Rovide and promote humane animal welfare to pets in need.

Animals

Pet Pal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to rescue dogs and cats from animal shelters that may otherwise be euthanized due to time limitations, illness, injuries or lack of socialization and training.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

11/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$33,484Arts & Culture$21,650Education$6,200Food & Nutrition$1,850Human Services$1,760Animals$1,250Health$100Environment$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE MORDECAI & ELINOR GABRIEL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

10get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DOWN THE BLOCK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 300526365 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DOWN THE BLOCK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Mordecai & Elinor Gabriel?

Find your warmest path to The Mordecai & Elinor Gabriel through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE MORDECAI & ELINOR GABRIEL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Mordecai & Elinor Gabriel?

More from the funding graph

THE MORDECAI & ELINOR GABRIEL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Mordecai & Elinor Gabriel?

More from the funding graph