Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Milton Weinstock Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$280kEducation$11kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$540
Median grant
3
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV$30,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE$5,639
Individual grant recipient$2,300
CONGREGATION SONS OF ISRAEL$1,980
CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV$540
Individual grant recipient$280
BEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES$250
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA$180
THE SHUL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $18k → 14%UTA OF KJ: $5k → 14%YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM: $7k → 20%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $5k → 28%YESHIVA EMEK HATORAH: $5k → 6%ANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE: $12k → 11%KHAL DIVREI CHAIM: $4k → 14%NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $30k → 13%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $10k → 14%YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM: $5k → 20%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $5k → 28%YESHIVA EMEK HATORAH: $3k → 6%CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV: $10k → 11%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $10k → 14%YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM: $5k → 20%ANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE: $10k → 11%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $9k → 14%CONG KETER TORAH: $3k → 20%NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $7k → 11%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $8k → 14%BAIS MEDRASH OF ARLINGTON: $6k → 11%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $7k → 14%BAIS MEDRASH OF ARLINGTON: $6k → 11%KHAL MEKOR CHAIM: $5k → 14%CONG BAIS MOSHE ZEV D'KABA: $5k → 20%ANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE: $6k → 11%PE'ER BAIS YAAKOV: $5k → 14%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $3k → 20%YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM: $5k → 11%CONG ZICHRON YOSEF: $6k → 20%ANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE: $4k → 11%CONG ZICHRON YOSEF: $2k → 20%YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM: $4k → 11%CONG OF WILLIAMS STREET: $3k → 11%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $8k → 14%BAIS MEDRASH OF ARLINGTON: $3k → 11%YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY: $6k → 14%OHR YISROEL: $3k → 11%CONG KNESSES YISROEL: $17k → 14%BNOS YAAKOV: $3k → 11%CONG KNESSES YISROEL: $14k → 14%CONG KNESSES YISROEL: $6k → 14%CONG KNESSES YISROEL: $3k → 14%KOLLEL CHATZOS: $9k → 20%THE CHEDER: $24k → 20%THE CHEDER: $7k → 20%BETH JACOB: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION BNEI HELMETZ: $30k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$288k · 16 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
31

Total granted

$288k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+80%

Still filing today

25%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YR
    YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $17k · revenue +130%
  • YO
    YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +17%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • KC
    KOLLEL CHATZOS
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • NB
    NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOVgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
2
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
4
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
5
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
6
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
7
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
8
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
9
Yeshivat Ohel Torah

To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education

Religion
10
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
11
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
12
Sephardic Bet Yaakov Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Bnos Yaakov Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Aleph Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INC: $73,600 · OtherYESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INCIndividual grant recipient: $40,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE INC: $31,874 · OtherANSHEI EAGLE RIDGE INCYESHIVA SHOLOM SHACHNA: $30,980 · OtherYESHIVA SHOLOM SHACHNAIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $30,000 · OtherNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOVIndividual grant recipient: $22,525 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAIS MEDRASH OF ARLINGTON: $15,550 · OtherCONGREGATION SONS OF ISRAEL: $13,740 · Other+37 more: $86,325 · Other+37 moreYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $11,050 · EducationCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $10,720 · EducationNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $7,000 · EducationYESHIVA RUACH CHAIM INC: $16,500 · Religion+1 more: $540 · ReligionTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $50 · Crime & Legal
Other$375,044Education$28,770Religion$17,040Crime & Legal$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA RUACH CHAIM INC: $16,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $11,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $10,720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI OORAH INC: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA RUACH CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds NACHLAS BAIS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAAREI OORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY34.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Joe & Eileen Sutton Family Foundation · Kitov Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Sheena Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Milton Weinstock Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Milton Weinstock Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Nachlas Bais Yaakov: 2% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Milton Weinstock Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Milton Weinstock Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Milton Weinstock’s filings →

More from the funding graph