Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Milton M Meyer and Mildred B Meyer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$95kReligion$36kYouth Development$16kInternational$14kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
7
States reached
$262k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cure for Childhood Cancer$10,000
Congregation Beth Ahabah$7,000
Childrens National Hospital$2,500
American Jewish World Service$1,000
Alzheimers Foundation of America$1,000
Palma Sola Botanical Garden$1,000
Girls Inc$1,000
Doctors Without Borders$750
Operation Blessing$750
Catholic Charities New York$750
Smile Train$750
Special Olympics$500
The Faison School$500
Art Center of Manatee County$500
The Susan B Komen Breast Cancer Fou$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARC: $750 → 12%PARC: $500 → 12%PARC: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
PA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$170k · 22 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$170k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+16%

Still filing today

45%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CHILDREN'S NATIONAL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +21%
  • GI
    GIRLS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +44%
  • AF
    ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $6k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF MANATEE COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AM
    ANNA MARIA COMMUNITY GROUP FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • TI
    TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
6
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
7
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
10
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cure for Childhood Cancer — $35,000 · OtherCure for Childhood CancerIndividual grant recipient — $24,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientART CENTER OF MANATEE COUNTY — $13,350 · OtherART CENTER OF MANATEE COUNTYCHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL — $12,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITALUNITED WAY OF MANATEE COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MANATEE COUNTYCongregation Beth Ahabah — $7,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC — $5,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH — $5,000 · Other+26 more — $22,025 · Other+26 moreCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $29,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONALALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDAT…GIRLS INC — $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,250 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $650 · InternationalMANATEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $3,650 · PhilanthropyPARC INC — $1,450 · Human ServicesHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,300 · Religion
Other$134,375Health$35,500Youth Development$15,500International$13,400Philanthropy$3,650Human Services$1,450Religion$1,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $29,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC — $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMANATEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $3,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $1,450 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPARC INC — $1,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC — $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUTNAM MUSEUM AND SCIENCE CENTER — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL
  • Who funds GIRLS INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds MANATEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds PARC INC
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Milton M Meyer and Mildred B Meyer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Parc Inc2% of income from government
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph