Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$42kEducation$34kAnimals$16kFood & Nutrition$16kCivil Rights$16kEnvironment$12kArts & Culture$11kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$974k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS & EXPRESSION$8,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS$8,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
FOODBANK INC$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON$5,000
AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY$5,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$5,000
TUNNELS2TOWERS$5,000
MIKE ROWE WORKS FOUNDATION$5,000
VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION DBA DAYTON LIVE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $5k → 16%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS & EXPRESSION: $8k → 22%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $5k → 9%TUNNELS2TOWERS: $5k → 11%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 14%GARY SINESE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $5k → 14%AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY: $5k → 7%MIKE ROWE WORKS FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $3k → 7%ONE TREE PLANTED: $4k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS & EXPRESSION: $5k → 22%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $5k → 9%TUNNELS2TOWERS: $3k → 11%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%FOODBANK INC: $5k → 14%ONE TREE PLANTED: $3k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS & EXPRESSION: $3k → 22%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $5k → 9%TUNNELS2TOWERS: $3k → 11%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $3k → 14%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $5k → 9%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%FOODBANK INC: $3k → 14%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $4k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%FOODBANK INC: $3k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $3k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $3k → 14%FOODBANK INC: $3k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $3k → 14%FOODBANK INC: $2k → 14%VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION DBA DAYTON LIVE: $4k → 14%VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION DBA DAYTON LIVE: $3k → 14%VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION DBA DAYTON LIVE: $3k → 14%VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION DBA DAYTON LIVE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
VA
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 9 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$137k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +11%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +66%
  • TF
    THE FOODBANK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CA
    CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -19%
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
10
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $23,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HO…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $23,000 · EducationNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PU…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO…FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $15,500 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION …HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $15,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCI…THE FOODBANK INC: $15,500 · Food & NutritionTHE FOODBAN…ONE TREE PLANTED INC: $6,500 · PhilanthropyONE TREE P…MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWO…GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyGARY SINIS…VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $11,000 · Arts & CultureCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $5,000 · Other
Health$41,500Education$33,500Civil Rights$15,500Animals$15,500Food & Nutrition$15,500Philanthropy$14,000Arts & Culture$11,000Other$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $23,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $15,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOODBANK INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Mike and Linda Davis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike and Linda Davis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph