Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Michael Murphey Western Institute In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$56kArts & Culture$36kReligion$2kRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$1kAnimals$965Community Improvement$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,030
Median grant
1
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAYLOR MUSEUM OF WACO AND MCLENNAN COUNTY HISTORY$3,935
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,030
FORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION$516
SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION$10
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
WY
CO
VA
NM
KS
TN
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18k · 4 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
16

Total granted

$18k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+96%

Still filing today

75%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TAYLOR MUSEUM OF WACO AND MCLENNAN COUNTY HISTORY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +57%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k
  • FT
    FORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JAMES & DOROTHY DOSS HERITAGE AND CULTURE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • FR
    FIONA ROSE MURPHEY CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HISTORIC LINCOLN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Historical Foundation

To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma

Arts & Culture
2
West Texas Hunting and Fishing Heritage Museum Inc

The Museum was organized to distribute educational information and data on animals of the world; and provide a channel for organized efforts to promote a public understanding and acceptance of sport hunting as an effective tool for…

Arts & Culture
3
Historic Waco Foundation Inc

To collect, maintain, preserve, publish and interpret the heritage and history of waco, mclennan county, texas

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of the Old West

Museum of the old west exists to conserve artifacts and buildings which represent the story of wyoming during our country's westward expansion from the fur trade era to the early 1900s. we educate the nearly 25,000 visitors per season on…

5
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
6
Wyoming Historical Society Group Return

To insure that wyoming's past remains accessible to present and future generations and to educate, support and foster the study of wyoming history.

7
Museum of the West Texas Frontier

The museum of the west texas frontier in stamford operates under the supervision and administration of the city of stamford. located in the heart of the cowboy country of texas, its supporters are vitally interested in the perpetuation of…

Arts & Culture
8
Cowboy Hall of Fame Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

To support the oklahoma city community foundation by supporting the national cowboy and western heritage museum.

Arts & Culture
9
The Museum of Western Art

The Museum of Western Art in the Texas Hill Country is dedicated to excellence in the collection, preservation and display of Western art.

Arts & Culture
10
Texas Cowboy Hall of Fame Inc
Arts & Culture
11
Texas Flying Legends Museum
12
Conservation History Association of Tx

The Association is developing, distributing and archiving oral histories, atlas maps and descriptive essays, and wildlife illustrations to expand public appreciation and grasp of Texas environmental history.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Folklife Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $47,944 · PhilanthropyAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $1,030 · PhilanthropyTHE JAMES & DOROTHY DOSS HERITAGE AND CULTURE CENTER — $7,264 · OtherTHE JAMES & DOROTHY DOSS HERITAG…FIONA ROSE MURPHEY CHARITABLE — $7,190 · OtherFIONA ROSE MURPHEY CHARITABLEFRIENDS OF HISTORIC LINCOLN — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HISTORIC LINCOLNIndividual grant recipient — $2,724 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION — $2,375 · OtherFORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATIONMUSEUM OF NORTHWEST COLORADO — $1,487 · OtherFORT WALLACE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION — $1,390 · OtherSOUTHWEST COLLECTION TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · Other+4 more — $1,278 · OtherTAYLOR MUSEUM OF WACO AND MCLENNAN COUNTY HISTORY — $11,435 · Arts & CultureTAYLOR MUSEUM OF WA…COWTOWN BIRTHPLACE OF WESTERN SWING — $3,800 · Arts & CultureCOWTOWN BIRTHPLACE …WESTERN FOLKLIFE CENTER INC — $1,200 · Arts & CultureWESTERN FOLKLIFE CE…SHERIDAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,159 · Arts & CultureSHERIDAN COUNTY HIS…CANA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · AnimalsMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE — $965 · AnimalsTAHLEQUAH TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $1,600 · Recreation & SportsCROSSROADS HORSE MINISTRY — $1,500 · ReligionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,040 · Human Services
Philanthropy$48,974Other$29,708Arts & Culture$17,594Animals$1,965Recreation & Sports$1,600Religion$1,500Human Services$1,040

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $47,944 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTAYLOR MUSEUM OF WACO AND MCLENNAN COUNTY HISTORY — $11,435 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOWTOWN BIRTHPLACE OF WESTERN SWING — $3,800 over 1y, 29% of budgetFORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION — $2,375 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTAHLEQUAH TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $1,600 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCROSSROADS HORSE MINISTRY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFORT WALLACE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION — $1,390 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWESTERN FOLKLIFE CENTER INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,159 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE — $965 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC — $498 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLARAMIE CHAMBER BUSINESS ALLIANCE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Michael Murphey Western Institute In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Michael Murphey Western Institute In?

Find your warmest path to The Michael Murphey Western Institute In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph