Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mezitt Horticultural Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$104kEnvironment$50kEducation$18kArts & Culture$10kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$284k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY$5,000
NEW ENGLAND BOTANIC GARDEN AT TOWER HILL$2,000
CORNELL BOTANICAL GARDENS$1,000
FRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS$1,000
NATIVE PLANT TRUST$1,000
GROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS$1,000
IPPS ER FOUNDATION$1,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY - ARNOLD ARBORETUM$1,000
FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY$1,000
FUTURE FARMERS AMERICA FOUNDATION$1,000
MNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE$1,000
RHODODENDRON SOCIETY MA CHAPTER$1,000
TRUSTEES OF RESERVATION$1,000
HERITAGE GARDENS$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $15k → 7%FUTURE FARMERS AMERICA FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%NATIVE PLANT TRUST: $2k → 8%TOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS FFA ASSOCIATION: $1k → 11%MNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $1k → 14%CORNELL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $1k → 16%HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 15%FRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS: $1k → 9%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $15k → 7%NATIVE PLANT TRUST: $1k → 8%TOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 11%RHODODENDRON SOCIETY MA CHAPTER: $1k → 11%MNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $1k → 14%CORNELL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $1k → 16%HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4k → 15%FRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS: $1k → 9%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $15k → 7%NEW ENGLAND BOTANIC GARDEN AT TOWER HILL: $2k → 11%MNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $1k → 14%HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3k → 15%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $15k → 7%TOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $2k → 11%HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2k → 15%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $14k → 7%TOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $1k → 11%TRUSTEES OF RESERVATION: $1k → 16%HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2k → 15%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $12k → 7%TOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $800 → 11%TRUSTEES OF RESERVATION: $1k → 16%HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1k → 15%MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $11k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $5k → 7%AMERICAN RHODODENDRON SOCIETY: $2k → 11%FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY: $2k → 8%HARVARD UNIVERSITY - ARNOLD ARBORETUM: $2k → 8%FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY: $2k → 8%FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY: $1k → 8%FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY: $1k → 8%HARVARD UNIVERSITY - ARNOLD ARBORETUM: $1k → 8%FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY: $1k → 8%FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETARY: $1k → 8%HARVARD UNIVERSITY - ARNOLD ARBORETUM: $750 → 8%HOPKINTON SUSTAINABLE GREEN COMMITTEE: $2k → 8%GROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS: $1k → 8%GROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS: $1k → 8%GROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 15 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$173k
$6k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +150%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +56%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • HS
    HOPKINTON SUSTAINABLE GREEN COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RHODODENDRON SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • MF
    MASSACHUSETTS FFA ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
Jenkins Arboretum & Gardens

The mission of the jenkins arboretum & gardens is to preserve natural, tranquil woodlands for community enjoyment, to showcase native plants and a world class collection of rhododendrons and azaleas, and to promote environmental…

Environment
4
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Foundation

To support charitable, plant-based scientific, and educational activities exclusively for the benefit of the minnesota landscape arboretum of the university of minnesota

Environment
5
Worcester County Horticultural Society

New england botanic garden at tower hill creates experiences with plants that inspire people and improve the world.

Environment
6
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
7
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
8
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
9
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
10
Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

—
11
The Garden Club Federation of Massachusetts Inc

Assisting member clubs with education and appreciation of horticulture, landscape and floral design, gardening and environmental concerns through workshops and schools.

Environment
12
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Mnla Foundation for Educational Excellence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $96,500 · OtherMA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETYTOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $9,800 · OtherTOWER HILL BOTANICAL GARDENSIPPS ER FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherCORNELL BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5,530 · Other+11 more: $15,950 · Other+11 moreHORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $16,500 · EnvironmentHORTICULTURAL RESEARCH …FRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS: $5,800 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARD…GROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,200 · EnvironmentGROW NATIVE MASSACHUSET…MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULT…NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $4,500 · EnvironmentNATIVE PLANT TRUST INCTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $2,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY: $8,850 · Arts & CultureISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $800 · Arts & CultureMNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $5,000 · EducationEMMANUEL COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education
Other$133,780Environment$39,000Arts & Culture$9,650Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $16,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY: $8,850 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS: $5,800 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $5,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetNATIVE PLANT TRUST INC: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM INC: $1,100 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetEMMANUEL COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BEDROCK GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds GROW NATIVE MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MNLA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM INC ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mezitt Horticultural Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mezitt Horticultural Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Native Plant Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Grow Native Massachusetts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Friends of Mount Auburn Cemetery: 1% of income from government
  • Emmanuel College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mezitt Horticultural’s filings →

More from the funding graph