Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Merrick Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$143kEducation$64kYouth Development$46kHuman Services$44kRecreation & Sports$24kFood & Nutrition$12kHousing & Shelter$9kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oath Central Surgery$10,000
Youth Endowment Source$10,000
Numotion$5,638
Emmanual Cancer Foundation$5,000
100 Black Men of Phila$3,500
Grands Stepping Up$3,000
Ed Banes Memorial Scholarship Fund$2,500
Food for the Poor Jamica$2,000
Sandstone Care$1,800
City Team$1,000
Propel Kids Foundation$1,000
Delco Training Center$414
Brandwine Youth Club$370
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Bridiges Foundation: $2k → 15%Quest Therapeutic Services: $4k → 6%Quest Therapeutic Services: $4k → 6%Cradles to Crayons: $2k → 22%Pathways PA: $500 → 10%Grands Stepping Up: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
DE
OK
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Merrick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 51%.

The Merrick Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 16 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
59

Total granted

$116k
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+15%

Still filing today

25%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyReligionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +102%
  • QT
    QUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $7k · revenue +54%
  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
    6× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • MW
    Mobility Works Leonard Park
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Child Care of the Berkshires Inc

The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…

—
3
The Bridge Family Center Inc

To foster the courage and strength in children and families to meet life's challenges and build fulfilling lives serving new haven, hartford and tolland counties.

—
4
Kids Beating Cancer Inc

Organization - kids beating cancer, inc., (kbc) is a nonprofit, nonstock florida corporation formed in 1992. kbc provides access to life-saving treatments through the science of cellular therapy and advancing pediatric innovative, novel,…

Human Services
5
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
6
Bridges Homeward Inc

Our mission is to provide high-quality support and advocacy for children, adults and families to develop and nurture safe, permanent relationships and maximize individual growth.

Human Services
7
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
8
Bounce Children's Foundation

Bounce children's foundation transforms the lives of chronically ill children, and their families, shifting all from surviving to thriving.

Health
9
The Children's Theraplay Foundation Inc

Medical facility providing physical, occupational and speech therapy for children with a wide range of special needs, including down syndrome, autism, cerebral palsy and many more. we see children from 18 months to 13 years old.

Health
10
Bridges Nj Inc

When a family is in crisis, Bridges is there to offer support by providing respite and host homes for children in our community. Children visit respite homes for several hours after school or on weekends to enjoy the benefit of a nurturing…

Human Services
11
Abilities Network Inc

Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health
12
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridges Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ed Banes Memorial Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $19,175 · OtherTHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INCMobility Works Leonard Park: $15,000 · OtherYouth Empowerment Source: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,711 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,434 · Other+68 more: $216,755 · Other+68 moreQUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC: $7,200 · Human ServicesGRANDS STEPPING UP: $3,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $2,110 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS PA INC: $500 · Human ServicesCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $6,413 · ReligionED BANES MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC: $472 · PhilanthropyNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,545 · Public Safety & DisasterSEBASTIAN RIDING ASSOCIATES: $1,110 · Recreation & SportsBRANDYWINE YOUTH CLUB INC: $370 · Youth Development
Other$330,075Human Services$14,810Religion$6,413Philanthropy$3,972Public Safety & Disaster$1,545Recreation & Sports$1,110Youth Development$370

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $19,175 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetQUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $6,413 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetED BANES MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $2,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,545 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEBASTIAN RIDING ASSOCIATES: $1,110 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPATHWAYS PA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC: $472 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ED BANES MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds GRANDS STEPPING UP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Merrick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Merrick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Merrick Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Merrick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Merrick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph