Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Melsness Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$453k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MFood & Nutrition$359kHealth$284kYouth Development$220kInternational$190kHousing & Shelter$44kArts & Culture$30kEducation$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $294k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $151k
$12,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$981k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE SPIRIT$101,241
WATSONS CHILDRENS SHELTER$50,000
GIG HARBOR KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL$40,000
VINE MAPLE PLACE$40,000
PROJECT 150$40,000
SOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION$34,000
FOOD AND BACKPACKS 4 KIDS$25,000
CARING FOR KIDS$25,000
SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION$20,000
STEP BY STEP$12,500
THE COFFEE OASIS$12,500
COMPASSION WASHINGTON$12,500
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$12,500
SIBLING STRONG$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $545k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KID COUNTRY DAY CARE: $2k → 10%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $8k → 8%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $1k → 10%PROJECT 150: $40k → 10%SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%KID COUNTRY DAY CARE: $2k → 10%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $7k → 8%SIBLING STRONG: $10k → 10%PROJECT 150: $40k → 10%SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $6k → 8%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%PROJECT 150: $30k → 10%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $6k → 8%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $4k → 8%THE COFFEE OASIS: $15k → 10%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $4k → 8%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $3k → 8%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER PROGRAM: $3k → 8%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $40k → 9%FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $10k → 9%HOPE SPARKS - RELATIVE RAISING: $30k → 9%HOPE SPARKS - RELATIVE RAISING: $5k → 9%STEP BY STEP: $25k → 9%THE COFFEE OASIS: $40k → 9%THE COFFEE OASIS: $13k → 9%THE COFFEE OASIS: $13k → 9%COMPASSION WASHINGTON: $35k → 9%COMPASSION WASHINGTON: $20k → 9%COMPASSION WASHINGTON: $13k → 9%COMPASSION WASHINGTON: $13k → 9%STEP BY STEP: $25k → 9%STEP BY STEP: $13k → 9%STEP BY STEP: $13k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
OR
NV
SD
CT
CA
UT
VA
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 35 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
12

Total granted

$2.1M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+45%

Still filing today

66%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    ONE SPIRIT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $374k · revenue +266%
  • SP
    Stevensville Pantry Partners Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $184k · revenue +220%
  • SS
    SOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +461%
  • HC
    HOPES CLOSET
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • 4C
    4C COALITION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids Against Hunger Bay Area

Kids against hunger bay areas' mission is to feed starving children, and to empower kids, teens and adults to be part of the solution. we do this by using volunteers to package and ship highly nutritious, life-saving meals to areas facing…

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc

The Food Bank of Northern Nevada, Inc.s (Food Banks) mission is Feeding the hungry today and solving hunger for tomorrow through community partnership. The Food Banks vision is Healthy Food. Every Person, Every Day.

Food & Nutrition
3
Real Kids Real Food
Education
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Bank of Alaska

FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food for Hope

Food for hope's mission is to empower and strengthen the future of their communities by providing nutritious food to children in need.

Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
8
Share Our Strength

All children and families deserve to live free from hunger and poverty. we're going to make that happen. we're helping communities feed children with our no kid hungry campaign and addressing the root causes of hunger and poverty. it's a…

Unclassified
9
Americas Kids Belong

Americas Kids Belong works to dramatically improve the experiences and outcomes of kids in foster care so they can thrive in safe,loving families, supported by Foster Friendly communities where they belong.

Human Services
10
Family Access Fighting for Childrens Rights
—
11
Selah-Naches Food Bank

The Organization's mission is to feed hungry people by soliciting and judiciously distribution food and grocery products and to educate the public about the nature of and solutions to the problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Med Access International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
28/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE SPIRIT: $373,741 · Human ServicesONE SPIRITPROJECT 150: $110,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 150Compassion Washington: $80,000 · Human ServicesCompassion WashingtonTHE COFFEE OASIS: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE COFFEE OASISSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $75,000 · Human ServicesSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTERAdopt-A-Native Elder: $40,065 · Human ServicesVINE MAPLE PLACE: $40,000 · Human ServicesHopeSparks: $35,000 · Human Services+7 more: $85,350 · Human Services+7 moreWATSONS CHILDRENS SHELTER: $150,000 · OtherWATSONS CHILDRENS SHELTERGIG HARBOR KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL: $122,000 · OtherGIG HARBOR KIWANIS INTERNATIONA…Individual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOOD AND BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $40,000 · OtherFOOD AND BACKPACKS 4 KIDSCM RUSSELL MUSEUM - PROGRAM FOR KIDS: $25,600 · OtherRAVALLI COUNTY 4-H FFA: $23,658 · Other+15 more: $92,651 · Other+15 moreStevensville Pantry Partners Food Bank: $184,000 · Food & NutritionStevensville P…Feeding America: $95,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Americ…+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION: $146,780 · HealthSOUTH SOUN…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…+3 more: $6,500 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $65,000 · InternationalCHILD AID: $65,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $30,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalSeattle Area Youth for Christ: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCARING FOR KIDS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $16,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$919,156Other$618,909Food & Nutrition$279,100Health$203,280International$165,000Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE SPIRIT: $373,741 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetStevensville Pantry Partners Food Bank: $184,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION: $146,780 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetPROJECT 150: $110,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFeeding America: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion Washington: $80,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE COFFEE OASIS: $80,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $75,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD AID: $65,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder: $40,065 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHopeSparks: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA STEP AHEAD IN PIERCE COUNTY: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN BRIDGES KID COUNTRY DAY CARE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBITTERROOT PERFORMING ARTS COUNCIL INC formerly Performing Arts Company Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMED ACCESS INTERNATIONAL: $1,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALASKA ARTS SOUTHEAST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScholastic Shooting Sports Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDVANTAGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA HOPE PROJECT INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBITTER ROOT HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds Stevensville Pantry Partners Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Compassion Washington ↗
  • Who funds THE COFFEE OASIS ↗
  • Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AID ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds HopeSparks ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Area Youth for Christ ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A STEP AHEAD IN PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS ↗
  • Who funds SIBLING STRONG ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN BRIDGES KID COUNTRY DAY CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Woodworth Family FoundationWA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Woodworth Family Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Multicare Health System · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Nehemiah Ventures · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation-Cari · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Ben B Cheney Foundation Inc · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Melsness Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Melsness Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Melsness Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Melsness Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Melsness Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph