· Private foundation
The Meacham Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE | $5,100 |
| HARBOR WILDWATCH | $5,000 |
| GIG HARBOR DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT ALLIANCE | $4,040 |
| SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION | $3,500 |
| JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK | $3,500 |
| GIG HARBOR NOW | $3,500 |
| YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES | $3,000 |
| JUNEAU HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS | $3,000 |
| KIWANIS FOUNDATION OF GIG HARBOR | $2,500 |
| NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA | $2,250 |
| GIG HARBOR BOATSHOP | $1,900 |
| GREATER GIG HARBOR FOUNDATION | $1,560 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS PENINSULA | $1,300 |
| DEL MAR WOMENS GIVING COLLECTIVE | $1,100 |
| HARBOR HISTORY MUSEUM | $1,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PWPrince William Sound Science & Technology Institute8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +47%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +47%
- GHGIG HARBOR WATERFRONT ALLIANCE6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +117%
Funded once
- AFAMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +70%
- CFCOWBOYS FOR A CAUSEone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue 0%
- FFFALCONS FULL COURT CLUB INCone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
To mobilize people in local communities around the world to protect marine wildlife and the oceans and inland watersheds that sustain them.
Our organization's mission is "conserving galpagos for nature and community," which we realize by saving imperiled species, restoring ecosystems, and building a more sustainable society in the galapagos archipelago.
GSA is a global non-governmental organization dedicated to advocacy, education and leadership for promoting responsible seafood practices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America and the most unlike its peers is Cowboys for a Cause. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Prince William Sound Science & Technology Institute ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds GIG HARBOR WATERFRONT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HARBOR WILDWATCH ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS SHELTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY ALASKA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds GIG HARBOR PENINSULA HISTORICAL SOC ↗
- Who funds GIG HARBOR CANOE KAYAK RACING TEAM ↗
- Who funds GIG HARBOR BOATSHOP ↗
- Who funds GREATER GIG HARBOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds NICOLAS FUND FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LONG LIVE THE KINGS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIG HARBOR NOW ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR TACOMA PIERCE COUNTY SOCIETY PREVENTION CRUELTY ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds POINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds COWBOYS FOR A CAUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Anne Hampton Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Seattle Foundation · Glein Family Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Bamford Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Meacham Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- American Fisheries Society — 9% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.