Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McQuaid Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Housing & Shelter$35kEducation$29kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$2kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHealth$1kEmployment$500Other$0
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS LLC$25,773
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ANDRE HOUSE$3,385
PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION$500
NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH$500
BANNER UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$500
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$500
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$500
ARIZONA SKY VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
MOTHER'S HEART$250
THE BE KIND PROJECT$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CIRCLE THE CITY: $1k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $500 → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $500 → 11%THE BE KIND PROJECT: $500 → 11%THE BE KIND PROJECT: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 12 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +297% since the first grant, against +80% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$63k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+297%
+80%

Still filing today

50%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Human Services Campus Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $29k · revenue ×19
  • CT
    CIRCLE THE CITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +372%
  • PP
    PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +297%

Funded once

  • SG
    ST GREGORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illumination Health Home formerly the Illumination Foundation

Our vision is to break the cycle of homelessness. Our public/private partnership combines healthcare and mental health services with housing and social services to reduce the impacts of homelessness and reduce people's vulerability to…

Human Services
2
Housing Partnerships Inc

Housing Partnerships, Inc creates great communities through direct investments and partnerships.

Housing & Shelter
3
Detroit Phoenix Center

To provide critical resources, support and a safe nurturing environment for youth transitioning out of homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
4
Homeward Pikes Peak

Homeward Pikes Peak empowers individuals and families to access stable housing, increase mental health, recovery, and economic stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Cochise Harm Reduction

Improving the lives of people who use drugs in rural communities.

Health
6
Tucson Interfaith Hivaids Network

Tucson Interfaith HIV/AIDS Network offers a compassionate interfaith response to HIV/AIDS, helping people with HIV to live well.

Health
7
Downtown Phoenix Inc

To facilitate collaboration, cultivate connections, and contribute to the growth and vitality of our community. to generate progress on issues, work toward sustainable growth, and build a stronger, more inclusive city core that generates…

Community Improvement
8
Bethany House Services Inc

Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
10
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
11
Found House-Interfaith Housing Network

Provide homeless families emergency shelter and hospitality through interfaith communities and to work with families to find and retain stable housing.

Religion
12
Arizona Ecumenical Council

Arizona Ecumenical Council dba Arizona Faith Network invites people into meaningful relationships, shared prayer and dialogue rooted in our faith traditions, and actions that influence public awareness, engagement and policy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Police Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mother's Heart Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $8,960 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOURGADE HIGH SCHOOL: $8,000 · OtherBOURGADE HIGH SCHOOLST MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL PHOENIX: $4,000 · OtherST MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL PHOENIXPHOENIX CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherPHOENIX CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLANDRE HOUSE: $3,385 · OtherANDRE HOUSEHope Ignites Phoenix: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+19 more: $7,350 · Other+19 moreHuman Services Campus Inc: $28,773 · Housing & ShelterHuman Services Campus IncCIRCLE THE CITY: $2,000 · Human ServicesBE KIND PROJECT: $750 · Human ServicesAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $1,000 · ReligionHOMELESS ID PROJECT INC: $500 · ReligionNew Pathways For Youth: $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$39,195Housing & Shelter$28,773Human Services$2,750Philanthropy$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,500Religion$1,500Crime & Legal$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHuman Services Campus Inc: $28,773 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBE KIND PROJECT: $750 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS ID PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMother's Heart Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Human Services Campus Inc ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE THE CITY ↗
  • Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds BE KIND PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds St Joseph the Worker ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS ID PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds Mother's Heart Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Garcia Family Foundation · Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McQuaid Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McQuaid Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McQuaid’s filings →

    More from the funding graph