Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McLoughlin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$466kHuman Services$363kCrime & Legal$235kCivil Rights$128kPhilanthropy$109kArts & Culture$80kYouth Development$61kRecreation & Sports$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $208k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE SCHOOLS$35,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$20,779
LORY'S PLACE$20,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN$15,000
CASS COUNTY CASA$15,000
FRENCH QUARTER FESTIVAL INC$15,000
UNDERGROUND RAILROAD$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
BIRTHRIGHT OF ST JOSEPH INC$10,250
CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$10,000
CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$10,000
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$10,000
READINESS CENTER$10,000
DOMESTIC & SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $259k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Domestic & Sexual Abuse Services: $6k → 13%READINESS CENTER: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC & SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $5k → 13%READINESS CENTER: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC & SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $5k → 13%Readiness Center Inc: $5k → 15%DOMESTIC & SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $3k → 13%READINESS CENTER: $5k → 15%Domestic and Sexual Abuse Services: $3k → 13%Domestic and Sexual Abuse Services: $1k → 13%Domestic and Sexual Abuse Services: $1k → 13%Readiness Center: $5k → 15%New Orleans Family Justice Center: $1k → 23%Readiness Center: $4k → 15%Readiness Center: $4k → 15%Cass County Council on Aging: $25k → 12%Readiness Center: $4k → 15%Readiness Center: $4k → 15%Readiness Center Inc: $400 → 15%Cass County Council on Aging: $12k → 12%Cass County Council on Aging: $12k → 12%CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 12%CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 12%Cass County Council on Aging: $10k → 12%Cass County Council on Aging: $10k → 12%CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 12%CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 12%CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 12%Cass County Council on Aging: $5k → 12%CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $5k → 12%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $15k → 12%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $15k → 12%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $15k → 12%Therapeutic Equestrian Center: $3k → 15%Therapeutic Equestrian Center: $3k → 15%Therapeutic Equestrian Center: $3k → 15%Therapeutic Equestrian Center: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
CA
DE
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 28 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
26

Total granted

$1.3M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+56%

Still filing today

64%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCivil RightsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CASS COUNTY CASA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $189k · revenue +5%
  • CC
    CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +50%
  • FQ
    FRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SM
    Southwestern Michigan College
    one grant, 2021 · $86k
  • SM
    Southwest Michigan College
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • UR
    Underground Railroad Society
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
2
Berrien County Cancer Services Inc

To provide compassionate in-home skilled nursing care and supportive resources for those affected by cancer and related illnesses in southwest michigan.

Health
3
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

—
4
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
5
Barry County United Way

None

Philanthropy
6
Child and Family Services of the Upper Peninsula Inc

To strengthen, nuture and empower children and families for a brighter future by providing programs that preserve the dignity and enhance the well-being of families throughout michigan's upper peninsula, in a caring, compassionate and…

Human Services
7
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Elder Law of Michigan

To advocate for, educate, and assist our target populations. our services address the needs of many different people, but we continue to target our services to older adults and persons with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
11
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
12
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Southwest Michigan; the most unlike its peers is The Fund for American Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Great Parents Great Start School: $174,206 · OtherGreat Parents Great Start SchoolLory's Place: $125,000 · OtherLory's PlaceSouthwestern Michigan College: $85,833 · OtherSouthwestern Michigan CollegeCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $60,779 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERUnderground Railroad Society URSCC: $35,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE LAKE SCHOOLS: $35,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $30,000 · OtherSouthwest Michigan College: $30,000 · Other+35 more: $229,840 · Other+35 moreCASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $129,000 · Human ServicesCASS COUNTY COUNCI…READINESS CENTER INC: $49,900 · Human ServicesREADINESS CENTER I…UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesUNDERGROUND RAILRO…DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $22,500 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC AND SEXUA…Therapeutic Equestrian Center: $11,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,250 · Human ServicesCASS COUNTY CASA INC: $188,500 · Civil RightsCASS COUNTY CAS…BIRTHRIGHT OF ST JOSEPH INC: $28,250 · Civil RightsBIRTHRIGHT OF S…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $87,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $86,000 · EducationFRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIVE STAR LIFE INC: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$805,658Human Services$258,650Civil Rights$216,750Philanthropy$104,000Education$86,000Arts & Culture$80,000Youth Development$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASS COUNTY CASA INC: $188,500 over 9y, 21% of budgetCASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $129,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $87,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $86,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetFRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetREADINESS CENTER INC: $49,900 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF ST JOSEPH INC: $28,250 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetDOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $22,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCASSOPOLIS MAIN STREET: $20,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BERRIEN AND CASS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetBERRIEN COUNTY COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN: $12,130 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTherapeutic Equestrian Center: $11,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAsheville GreenWorks: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF CITY PARK: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNILES-BUCHANAN MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $7,500 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetMI LIFE IN NUMBERS: $7,250 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Southwest MI: $7,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetFORGOTTEN MAN MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFERNWOOD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLakeland Immediate Care Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE STAR LIFE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN GATEWAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASS COUNTY CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INC ↗
  • Who funds READINESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF ST JOSEPH INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CASSOPOLIS MAIN STREET ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BERRIEN AND CASS INC ↗
  • Who funds BERRIEN COUNTY COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Equestrian Center ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TEACHING ECONOMICS ↗
  • Who funds Hospice at Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds Asheville GreenWorks ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CITY PARK ↗
  • Who funds NILES-BUCHANAN MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds MI LIFE IN NUMBERS ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Southwest MI ↗
  • Who funds BERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF CASS COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berrien Community Foundation IncMI29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berrien Community Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Degroot Family Foundation · United Way of Southwest Michigan · Whirlpool Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Wood Foundation Inc · Hanson Family Foundation · Bill Nygren Foundation · The Covia Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McLoughlin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McLoughlin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The McLoughlin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The McLoughlin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McLoughlin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph