Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McGowan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.5MReligion$548kHealth$255kHousing & Shelter$195kHuman Services$140kArts & Culture$106kYouth Development$102kEducation$101kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF MCALESTER$70,520
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$45,000
COMMUNITY OF HOPE$33,000
RYANS HOUSE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$15,800
MCALESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS$12,500
TABERNACLE OF PRAISE WORSHIP CENTER$10,000
MCALESTER AREA ARTS & HUMANITIES$10,000
MT TRIUMPH BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
WESTMINSTER CHURCH FOUNDATION$10,000
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
LIFECHURCH$5,000
GREATER OKC PANHELLENIC FOUNDATION$2,900
CHEROKEE CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JOHN 316 MISSION: $500 → 15%SHARED BLESSING: $22k → 17%SHARED BLESSING: $21k → 17%SHARED BLESSING: $21k → 17%SHARED BLESSING: $21k → 17%SHARED BLESSING: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
PA
CO
MO
NM
AR
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 33 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
31

Total granted

$2.8M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+20%

Still filing today

12%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SHARED BLESSINGS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $95k · revenue +27%
  • IO
    INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE RAINBOW
    2× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • PI
    PRIDE IN MCALESTER INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • KP
    KIOWA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $22k · revenue -124%
  • CG
    CART GUY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
2
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
3
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
4
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
5
Philippians 3 13 Ministries

Transitional living for recovered addicts.

Health
6
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
7
Oasis of Northwest Arkansas Inc

Oasis of Northwest Arkansas provides sober housing and resources for women in recovery and their children.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Remnant House

The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

Health
9
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
10
Oklahoma Saved By Grace Restoration

To rehabilitate homeless and drug addicts

Religion
11
Planted Seed Ministries Inc

Planted Seed Ministries offers and supportive services to homeless individuals. We are a public charity.

Religion
12
Pro-Hope Inc

Sober living and community residential services

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shared Blessings Inc; the most unlike its peers is Potts Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF MCALESTER: $1,453,956 · OtherCITY OF MCALESTERLIFE CHURCH INC: $383,150 · OtherLIFE CHURCH INCPC CARE INC: $226,200 · OtherPC CARE INCHOPE HOUSE: $185,000 · OtherHOPE HOUSE+53 more: $606,133 · Other+53 moreSHARED BLESSINGS INC: $95,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · EducationDelta Gamma Society of Minnesota: $1,000 · EducationPRIDE IN MCALESTER INC: $12,000 · EnvironmentThe Good Samaritan Outreach: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHOSPICE OF MCALESTER INC: $3,390 · HealthREFINED SILVER INC: $1,400 · HealthNORTHSIDE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · HealthLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC: $4,500 · Public BenefitNATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION: $500 · Religion
Other$2,854,439Human Services$95,500Education$23,000Environment$12,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Health$5,290Public Benefit$4,500Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARED BLESSINGS INC: $95,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE RAINBOW: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Good Samaritan Outreach: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPOTTS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREFINED SILVER INC: $1,400 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARED BLESSINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE RAINBOW ↗
  • Who funds PRIDE IN MCALESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Good Samaritan Outreach ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MCALESTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Puterbaugh FoundationOK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Puterbaugh Foundation · The Fugitt Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McGowan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McGowan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McGowan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph