Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McComb Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$378k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.3MHealth$451kEducation$400kCrime & Legal$290kAnimals$37kArts & Culture$26kYouth Development$25kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $320k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SELBY GARDENS$320,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTH$50,000
Individual grant recipient$8,429
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Malvern Retreat House: $500 → 6%BUCKS COUNTY PLAYHOUSE: $500 → 6%Audobon North Carolina: $33k → 17%LADIES OF HOPE MINISTRY: $10k → 28%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $111k → 9%LEMUR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ARMS OPEN: $5k → 11%AUDOBON OF NC: $33k → 9%AUDOBOON OF NORTH CAROLINA: $33k → 11%University of Miami: $58k → 12%Univ of Chicago Booth: $3k → 14%DREW UNIVERSITY: $3k → 4%Arms Open: $3k → 6%Misc Donations: $6k → 11%ARMS OPEN: $3k → 6%Planned Parenthood: $5k → 17%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $110k → 9%ARMS OPEN: $3k → 11%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $53k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTH: $50k → 14%NJ Scholars Program: $500 → 11%THE MARSHALL PROJECT: $60k → 17%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $110k → 9%MIAMI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $52k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTH: $50k → 14%THE MARSHALL PROJECT: $50k → 17%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $110k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTH: $50k → 14%THE MARSHALL PROJECT: $50k → 17%SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTH: $50k → 14%THE MARSHALL PROJECT: $50k → 17%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF DOLPHIN RESEARCH: $3k → 9%UNIV OF CHICAGO BOOTH KILTS CENTER: $25k → 14%THE MARSHALL PROJECT: $50k → 17%SELBY GARDENS: $320k → 9%The Marshall Project: $30k → 17%SELBY GARDENS: $295k → 9%OVERSEA PRESS CLUB: $1k → 17%SELBY GARDENS: $232k → 9%SELBY GARDENS: $230k → 9%SELBY GARDENS: $216k → 9%SELBY GARDENS EDUCATION FUND: $25k → 9%Selby Botanical Gardens: $5k → 9%SELBY GARDENS: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 7 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +133% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$2.3M
$373k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+133%
-2%

Still filing today

14%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    SELBY GARDENS
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M
  • SM
    SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $330k
  • TM
    THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $290k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Miami
    one grant, 2017 · $58k
  • MU
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $53k
  • MU
    Miami University Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $52k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
2
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education
3
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
4
Laguna College of Art & Design

Laguna college of art & design prepares individuals for careers as creative artists and designers in a culturally and ethnically diverse world through a curriculum that emphasizes acquiring skills based on observation, representation, and…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Morris College

The mission of morris college is to produce graduates who can pursue useful and productive careers and in so doing enhance their own lives and the society in which they take their places. that mission is being successfully implemented by…

Education
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
9
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
10
Ringling College of Art and Design Inc

Ringling college of art and design is a small, private college offering programs leading to degrees that prepare students to be discerning visual thinkers and ethical practitioners in their chosen area of art and design. ringling's…

Education
11
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
12
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Marshall Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lemur Conservation Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SELBY GARDENS: $1,298,559 · OtherSELBY GARDENSSARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $330,000 · OtherSARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTH: $202,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BOOTHSARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $115,500 · Other+18 more: $377,368 · Other+18 moreTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $290,000 · Community ImprovementTHE MARSHALL…Miami University Foundation: $52,000 · EducationDREW UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationSARASOTA AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL COALITION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLemur Conservation Foundation Inc: $1,250 · Science & Tech
Other$2,323,927Community Improvement$290,000Education$55,000Arts & Culture$25,000Science & Tech$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $290,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSARASOTA AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetDREW UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLemur Conservation Foundation Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds DREW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lemur Conservation Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY SCHOLARS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LAYMEN'S RETREAT LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McComb Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McComb Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Drew University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McComb Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McComb Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McComb Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph