Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McAlister Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$481k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.2MHuman Services$400kReligion$390kHousing & Shelter$119kHealth$81kYouth Development$67kArts & Culture$31kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $245,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $481,222 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $236,222 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k10 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAURENS FAMILY YMCA$70,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$65,000
CLINTON FAMILY YMCA$20,000
HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY$10,000
LAURENS COUNTY CANCER ASSOCIATION$10,000
LAURENS COUNTY FUTURE SCHOLARS$10,000
LAURENS CO MEMORIAL HOME$10,000
BRIDGING THE GAP ADVOCACY$7,500
LAURENS COUNTY MUSEUM$7,500
LAURENS COUNTY ROTARY CLUB$6,000
NEW PROSPECT BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
LAURENS CO BAPTIST CRISIS CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
C4 OF LAURENS COUNTY FAMILY PROMISE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $30k → 18%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $10k → 18%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $10k → 18%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $5k → 18%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $5k → 18%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $10k → 18%HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $10k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $3k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $3k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAURENS COUNTY: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$1.4M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+11%

Still filing today

25%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    7× · 2020–2026 · $455k
  • LF
    LAURENS FAMILY YMCA
    7× · 2020–2026 · $390k
  • CF
    CLINTON FAMILY YMCA
    5× · 2022–2026 · $100k

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LAURENS
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC
    one grant, 2025 · $2k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $455,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHLAURENS FAMILY YMCA: $390,000 · OtherLAURENS FAMILY YMCACLINTON FAMILY YMCA: $100,000 · OtherCLINTON FAMILY YMCALAURENS CO MEMORIAL HOME: $50,000 · OtherLAURENS COUNTY FUTURE SCHOLARS: $50,000 · Other+12 more: $210,500 · Other+12 moreHOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesC4 MINISTRIES OF LAURENS COUNTY: $9,000 · Human ServicesFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGING THE GAP ADVOCACY: $17,500 · EducationLAURENS COUNTY CANCER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,255,500Human Services$89,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Education$17,500Health$10,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC: $35,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetBRIDGING THE GAP ADVOCACY: $17,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetC4 MINISTRIES OF LAURENS COUNTY: $9,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LAURENS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MCCORMICK SC INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGING THE GAP ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds LAURENS COUNTY CANCER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds C4 MINISTRIES OF LAURENS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McAlister Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McAlister Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McAlister’s filings →

    More from the funding graph