Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Maxwell Thomas Bras Fntdn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$506kAnimals$230kHousing & Shelter$95kHealth$28kPublic Benefit$23kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$7kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARKHAM WOODS PRES CHURCH$120,000
THE SHARING CENTER$50,000
SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS$25,000
RESCUE OUTREACH MISSION$10,000
RESTORATION CHURCH OF SANFORD$5,000
THE PICNIC PROJECT$5,000
FISHERHOUSE FOUNDATION$5,000
GIVE KIDS THE WORLD$5,000
NAMIGO$5,000
Z883 RADIO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $30k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$886k · 10 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$886k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+14%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +146%
  • RO
    RESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +118%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • MW
    MASSACHUSETTS WOMENS POLITICAL CAUC
    one grant, 2018 · $23k
  • CF
    CANCER FDTN-DOLPHINS CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BF
    BROOKESTRONG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
A Better Chance International Rescue
—
5
Project Street Vet

Project Street Vet empowers veterinary teams to deliver professional, non-judgmental medical care & support to pet families experiencing homelessness and housing vulnerability.

Animals
6
The Jack Canine Foundation
—
7
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
8
Rainbow Rescues
—
9
Pet's Miracle Network Inc
Animals
10
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
11
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
12
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brookestrong Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARKHAM WOODS PRES CHURCH: $496,475 · OtherMARKHAM WOODS PRES CHURCHTHE SHARING CENTER: $77,000 · OtherTHE SHARING CENTERMASSACHUSETTS WOMENS POLITICAL CAUC: $23,000 · Other+8 more: $68,350 · Other+8 moreSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $230,200 · Human ServicesSoutheastern Guide Dogs IncRESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $18,000 · Housing & ShelterPICNIC PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionBROOKESTRONG FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Food & NutritionSPCA INC: $200 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · Health
Other$664,825Human Services$230,200Housing & Shelter$18,000Food & Nutrition$7,000Animals$200Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $230,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetRESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE OUTREACH MISSION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds PICNIC PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKESTRONG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Maxwell Thomas Bras Fntdn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Maxwell Thomas Bras Fntdn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Spca Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maxwell Thomas Bras Fntdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph