Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mason Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Arts & Culture$6kHealth$3kReligion$3kInternational$1kHuman Services$900Community Improvement$500Housing & Shelter$200Membership Benefit$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300
Median grant
1
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
SOUTH ARKANSAS SYMPHONY$500
SOUTH ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER$300
BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH$150
OPEN HEARTS MINISTRIES$100
SOUTH ARKANSAS PRESERVATION SOCIETY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%Hope Landing: $800 → 19%Hope Landing: $700 → 19%Hope Landing: $500 → 19%Hope Landing: $300 → 19%Hope Landing: $200 → 19%Hope Landing: $100 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11k · 8 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$11k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+99%

Still filing today

63%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    HOPE LANDING INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • SA
    SOUTH ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER
    5× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • SA
    SOUTH ARKANSAS SYMPHONY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AH
    Agape House Childrens Home
    one grant, 2018 · $800 · revenue -71%
  • MS
    Main Street El Dorado Arkansas
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • SA
    South Arkansas Symphony Orchestra
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Searcy Childrens Home Inc Sparrows Promise

Providing hope for children and families in the arkansas child welfare system provide foster care, supervised visitation services, a safe space for children to rest while waiting on a foster family and training for foster families.

2
South Arkansas Children's Coalition

The organization and its volunteers served as advocates for abused and neglected children. the nationwide organization has helped more than two million children.

Civil Rights
3
Northwest Arkansas Children's Shelter in Dba Everhope Arkansas Inc

To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.

Human Services
4
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
5
Southern Arkansas University Foundation Inc

Provide financial aid & scholarships

Education
6
South Arkansas Fights Aids

None

Health
7
Rise House Arkansas

To provide assistance to victims of domestic abuse and to educate the community to work toward the prevention of family violence.

Human Services
8
Restoration of Hope Inc

Provide tempory shelter to women and children in abusive domestic situations in arkansas county, ar

Human Services
9
Dana's House Inc

To provide care for needy children and young adults.

Housing & Shelter
10
Arkansas Hospice Foundation Inc

Arkansas hospice foundation is a non-profit, charitable 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to raise public awareness and financial support for arkansas hospice and related organization's programs and services, and to help donors meet…

Health
11
Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History Inc

The Foundation for Arkansas Heritage and History was established to help further the mission of the Division of Arkansas Heritage; to identify Arkansass Heritage and enhance the quality of life by the discovery,preservation and…

Arts & Culture
12
Agape House Asia Inc

Agape house asia exists to care for orphaned and abandoned children in south asia

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Arkansas Arts Center and the most unlike its peers is Open Hearts Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $2,035 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHAgape House Childrens Home — $800 · OtherAgape House Childrens HomeBIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH — $630 · OtherBIBLE BAPTIST CHURCHSOUTH ARKANSAS HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $600 · OtherSOUTH ARKANSAS HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETYMain Street El Dorado Arkansas — $500 · OtherMain Street El Dorado ArkansasSouth Arkansas Symphony Orchestra — $500 · OtherSouth Arkansas Symphony OrchestraThe Muses Creative Aristry Project — $250 · OtherMagdalene House — $200 · OtherAmerican Legion Aux unit 297 — $200 · Other+2 more — $200 · OtherSOUTH ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER — $2,500 · Arts & CultureSOUTH ARKANSAS ARTS CENTERSOUTH ARKANSAS SYMPHONY — $1,800 · Arts & CultureSOUTH ARKANSAS SYMPHONYHOPE LANDING INC — $2,600 · Human ServicesHOPE LANDING INCWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE — $100 · Human ServicesOPEN HEARTS MINISTRIES — $1,100 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 · Health
Other$5,915Arts & Culture$4,300Human Services$2,700International$1,100Health$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOPE LANDING INC — $2,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS SYMPHONY — $1,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOPEN HEARTS MINISTRIES — $1,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAgape House Childrens Home — $800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE LANDING INC
  • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS SYMPHONY
  • Who funds OPEN HEARTS MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Agape House Childrens Home
  • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alderson Family FoundationAR13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alderson Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mason Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph