Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mary E Groff Charitable Trust 2631-00-46

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$347k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$1.9MHealth$402kScience & Tech$56kArts & Culture$15kRecreation & Sports$15kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $327k
$77,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Washington Foundation$100,000
Washington University$100,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$77,250
Washington University$50,000
Mercer Island Schools Foundation$10,000
Cristo Rey Jesuit Seattle Corporate$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $41k → 8%Williams College: $130k → 12%American Brain Foundation: $93k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $140k → 22%ACUS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $77k → 17%Trinity University: $25k → 16%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $40k → 11%Cristo Rey Jesuit Seattle Corporate: $10k → 9%MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $15k → 8%Williams College: $100k → 12%American Brain Foundation: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $70k → 22%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $77k → 17%Trinity University: $25k → 16%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Washington University: $150k → 11%Christo Rey Seattle High School: $10k → 9%Williams College: $50k → 12%American Brain Foundation: $50k → 11%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Washington University: $100k → 11%University of Washington Foundation: $100k → 9%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $30k → 12%American Brain Foundation: $50k → 11%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Washington University: $100k → 11%Mercer Island Schools Foundation: $10k → 9%Williams College: $20k → 12%AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $43k → 11%Georgetown University: $50k → 14%Washington University: $50k → 11%Mercer Island Schools Foundation: $10k → 9%American Brain Foundation: $43k → 11%Washington University: $50k → 11%Mercer Island Schools Foundation: $10k → 9%AMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION: $43k → 11%Washington University: $50k → 11%Mercer Island Schools Foundation: $10k → 9%American Brain Foundation: $43k → 11%Washington University: $50k → 11%FIRST NIGHT PROJECT: $10k → 9%American Brain Foundation: $43k → 11%FIRST NIGHT PROJECT: $5k → 9%THE FILM SCHOOL: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Mary E Groff Charitable Trust 2631-00-46’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 9% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Mary E Groff Charitable Trust 2631-00-46lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 10 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

90%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $590k · revenue +76%
  • Williams College
    4× · 2018–2022 · $330k · revenue +36%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • AF
    Acus Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -19% · 31% of their budget
  • TF
    THE FILM SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • CR
    Cristo Rey Jesuit Seattle High School
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Cristo Rey Jesuit Seattle High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $590,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYWilliams College — $330,000 · EducationWilliams CollegeGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $224,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $210,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION+3 more — $75,000 · EducationAmerican Brain Foundation — $236,667 · OtherAmerican Brain …MERCER ISLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $57,960 · OtherMERCER ISLAND S…THE FILM SCHOOL — $15,000 · Other+4 more — $27,380 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION — $223,333 · HealthAMERICAN BR…Acus Foundation — $20,000 · HealthAcus Founda…MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY — $55,800 · Science & TechMERCER ISLAND LACROSSE CLUB — $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$1,779,500Other$337,007Health$243,333Science & Tech$55,800Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $590,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College — $330,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $224,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BRAIN FOUNDATION — $223,333 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $210,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERCER ISLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $57,960 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY — $55,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity University — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAcus Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetMERCER ISLAND LACROSSE CLUB — $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMERCER ISLAND HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL — $15,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mary E Groff Charitable Trust 2631-00-46 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • Marine Biological Laboratory20% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph