Skip to content
The Mary Angiola Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Mary Angiola Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$36kEnvironment$35kEducation$31kSocial Science$8kInternational$8kHealth$6k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$290k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REED CENTER FOR ECOSYSTEM REINTEGRA$4,000
PUENTES DE SALUD$2,500
FOOD AND WATER WATCH$2,500
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$2,500
CTR FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTER$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,500
LA REGIONAL FOOD BANK$2,000
POPULATION MEDIA CENTER$1,500
POPULATION CONNECTION$1,000
EARTH OVERSHOOT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%POPULATION BALANCE: $3k → 14%PUENTES DE SALUD: $3k → 22%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LA REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $4k → 14%POPULATION CONNECTION: $1k → 14%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%OHSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%POST CARBON INSTITUTE: $1k → 18%POPULATION MEDIA CENTER: $2k → 10%REED CENTER FOR ECOSYSTEM REINTEGRA: $4k → 6%UNIV OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $2k → 11%POPULATION BALANCE: $2k → 14%PUENTES DE SALUD: $1k → 22%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LA REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $3k → 14%POPULATION CONNECTION: $1k → 14%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%POST CARBON INSTITUTE: $1k → 18%POPULATION MEDIA CENTER: $2k → 10%REED CENTER FOR ECOSYSTEM REINTEGRA: $3k → 6%UNIV OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $2k → 11%POPULATION BALANCE: $2k → 14%PUENTES DE SALUD: $1k → 22%LA REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2k → 14%POPULATION CONNECTION: $1k → 14%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%POPULATION MEDIA CENTER: $2k → 10%REED CENTER FOR ECOSYSTEM REINTEGRA: $3k → 6%POPULATION BALANCE: $2k → 14%LA REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%POPULATION CONNECTION: $1k → 14%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%POPULATION MEDIA CENTER: $2k → 10%REED CENTER FOR ECOSYSTEM REINTEGRA: $3k → 6%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%CTR FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTER: $3k → 14%CTR FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTER: $3k → 14%CTR FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTER: $3k → 14%CTR FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTER: $3k → 14%FOOD AND WATER WATCH: $3k → 14%FOOD AND WATER WATCH: $3k → 14%FOOD AND WATER WATCH: $3k → 14%FOOD AND WATER WATCH: $3k → 14%FOOD AND WATER WATCH: $3k → 14%FOOD AND WATER WATCH: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
OR
PA
CA
MD
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Mary Angiola Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Mary Angiola Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 15 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$105k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationSocial ScienceAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The REED Center for Ecosystem Reintegration
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +15%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +67%
  • POPULATION CONNECTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • OF
    OHSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY ENVIRONMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • WP
    WORLD POPULATION BALANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
The Earth Genome

We exist to ensure the world's key decision makers consistently and routinely take into account the full value of nature and the consequences of their activities on natural systems, thereby averting economic and social disruptions due to…

Environment
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
11
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
12
Zero Foodprint

Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Population Media Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Puentes De Salud. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $21,500 · OtherBEND SR HIGH SCHOLARSHIP FUNDLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $11,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $3,000 · OtherUNIV OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKCTR FOR SCIENCEPUB INTEREST: $1,750 · Other+4 more: $4,500 · Other+4 moreFOOD & WATER WATCH: $14,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD & WATER WATCHThe REED Center for Ecosystem Reintegration: $13,000 · Food & NutritionThe REED Center for Ecosystem Rein…CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $10,500 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC I…CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $10,500 · AnimalsCENTER FO…POPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC: $6,000 · EducationEarth Overshoot Inc: $2,000 · EducationPOPULATION CONNECTION: $7,500 · Social SciencePUENTES DE SALUD: $4,500 · HealthSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EnvironmentMETAFOUNDATION DBA POST CARBON INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Environment
Other$49,250Food & Nutrition$37,500Animals$10,500Education$8,000Social Science$7,500Health$4,500Environment$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe REED Center for Ecosystem Reintegration: $13,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUENTES DE SALUD: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Overshoot Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMETAFOUNDATION DBA POST CARBON INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD POPULATION BALANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds The REED Center for Ecosystem Reintegration ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PUENTES DE SALUD ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Earth Overshoot Inc ↗
  • Who funds METAFOUNDATION DBA POST CARBON INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD POPULATION BALANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary Angiola Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary Angiola Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Angiola’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home