Skip to content
The Marty and Iris Walshin Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Marty and Iris Walshin Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$331kEducation$220kHuman Services$30kYouth Development$29kRecreation & Sports$20kCommunity Improvement$7kEmployment$3kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROADWAYCARESORG$2,664
ST JOHN'S RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL$2,500
PROVIDENCE ANIMAL SHELTER$2,500
BRIDGE 127$1,750
PHILADELPHIA CLUB FOUNDATION$1,700
Individual grant recipient$1,620
CLT REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER$1,000
SUPER SCRATCH FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGE 127: $2k → 12%BRIDGE 127 INC: $2k → 12%NORTH YONKERS PRESERVATION DEVELOPM: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CT
MD
DE
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$813k · 11 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$813k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+28%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $250k · revenue +88%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    5× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +578%
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL ANDRUS PARKCARE & DOBBS FERRY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • UG
    UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +138%
  • E
    ECAD
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
  • NY
    NORTH YONKERS PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
2
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
3
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

—
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
John Muir Health Foundation

John muir health foundation is dedicated to inspiring and stewarding philanthropic support for all programs, services and facilities of john muir health

Health
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Yonkers Preservation and Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Untermyer Gardens Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $215,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND: $200,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $25,539 · Other+12 more: $52,466 · Other+12 moreTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $250,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIATHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $38,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON…ST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL ANDRUS PARKCARE & DOBBS FERRY: $30,125 · HealthST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL ANDRUS PARKCAR…+2 more: $3,400 · HealthMALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationCECIL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationACADEMY IN MANAYUNK: $2,500 · EducationUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsPHILADELPHIA CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $8,820 · EmploymentNORTH YONKERS PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE 127 INC: $3,250 · Human ServicesJ FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$493,005Health$321,525Education$19,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Employment$8,820Human Services$8,250Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL ANDRUS PARKCARE & DOBBS FERRY: $30,125 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJULIA DYCKMAN ANDRUS MEMORIAL INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $8,820 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetNORTH YONKERS PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCECIL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE 127 INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetACADEMY IN MANAYUNK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEE ONE FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $390 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL ANDRUS PARKCARE & DOBBS FERRY ↗
  • Who funds JULIA DYCKMAN ANDRUS MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH YONKERS PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CECIL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE 127 INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY IN MANAYUNK ↗
  • Who funds WEE ONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds J FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marty and Iris Walshin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marty and Iris Walshin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marty and Iris Walshin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home