Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MEnvironment$1.3MEducation$255kPhilanthropy$245kCommunity Improvement$155kArts & Culture$135kHealth$75kCivil Rights$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $745k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $360k
$25,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CT NOFA NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF CT$60,000
BLACK FARMER FUND INC$50,000
FORA$50,000
POTLIKKER CAPITAL$50,000
RACHEL'S NETWORK INC$50,000
MAD AGRICULTURE$50,000
ZERO FOOTPRINT PROJECT INC$50,000
BLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC$25,000
MANZANITA CAPITAL COLLECTIVE COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION$25,000
OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC$25,000
PLEIADES NETWORK INC$25,000
JUBILEE JUSTICE INC$25,000
REWILD (REWILDING ARGENTINA)$25,000
FOODSHED CAPITAL$25,000
CONNECTICUT FARMLAND TRUST INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELWYN: $25k → 10%ELWYN FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 50 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
19

Total granted

$4.0M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+29%

Still filing today

70%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CITY SEED INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +119% · 32% of their budget
  • GO
    GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $175k · revenue +424%
  • RN
    RACHEL'S NETWORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • BARD COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +135%
  • RN
    RACHEL'S NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • EO
    ELWYN OF PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWAREgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
2
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
3
Sustainable Growers
—
4
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
5
Regenerative Farms Inc

To scale up forest protection and transition to regenerative agriculture by incubating adoption of the Regeneration Hub model. RF fulfills its Mission to catalyze planetary regeneration, empower women & indigenous communities in order to…

Food & Nutrition
6
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
7
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
8
Organic Farmers Association

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…

Food & Nutrition
9
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Land Institute

When people, land, and community are as one, all three members prosper; when they relate not as members but as competing interests, all three are exploited. by consulting nature as the source and measure of that membership, the land…

—
11
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
12
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tomkat Ranch Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
39/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZERO FOOTPRINT PROJECT INC: $175,000 · OtherZERO FOOTPRINT PROJECT INCCT NOFA NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF CT: $100,000 · OtherCT NOFA NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMERS ASSOCIATI…THE CARROT PROJECT (THRU MISSION WORKS INC): $85,000 · OtherNORTHEAST FARMERS OF COLOR LAND RESIST INC: $80,000 · OtherFORA: $75,000 · OtherMANZANITA CAPITAL COLLECTIVE COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherRIDGES TO RIVERS OPEN SPACE NETWORK: $75,000 · OtherMINNOW SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIES LAW CENTER: $70,000 · OtherRACHEL'S NETWORK INC: $175,000 · OtherRACHEL'S NETWORK INCGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $130,000 · OtherGLYNWOOD CENTER INCFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $125,000 · OtherFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC+23 more: $527,000 · Other+23 moreCITY SEED INC: $400,000 · Food & NutritionCITY SEED INCMAD AGRICULTURE: $130,000 · Food & NutritionMAD AGRICULTUREConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $95,000 · Food & NutritionConnecticut Farmland Trust I…JUBILEE JUSTICE INC: $75,000 · Food & NutritionJUBILEE JUSTICE INCFOODSHED CAPITAL: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFOODSHED CAPITALREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionCivil Eats: $50,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $40,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more: $65,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 moreGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $175,000 · EducationGREENWAVE OR…PLEIADES NETWORK INC: $105,000 · EducationPLEIADES NET…BLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC: $75,000 · EducationBLACK WOMEN …FAMILY AGRICULTURE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES: $60,000 · EducationFAMILY AGRIC…THE BERRY CENTER INC: $50,000 · EducationTHE BERRY CE…BARD COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationOCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $125,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN RESEAR…NATIVE CONSERVANCY: $80,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE CONSE…NATUREBRIDGE: $75,000 · EnvironmentNATUREBRIDGEUrban Tilth: $70,000 · EnvironmentUrban TilthTOMPKINS CONSERVATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentTOMPKINS CON…WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $50,000 · EnvironmentWHITE BUFFAL…Occidental Arts and Ecology Center: $20,000 · EnvironmentEQUITY TRUST INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureSAVE ELLIS ISLAND INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $105,000 · Community ImprovementPOTLIKKER CAPITAL: $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementFlowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc: $70,000 · PhilanthropyMeridian Institute: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyWolfe's Neck Farm Foundation: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTOMKAT RANCH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,692,000Food & Nutrition$1,085,000Education$490,000Environment$470,000Arts & Culture$235,000Community Improvement$215,000Philanthropy$185,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY SEED INC: $400,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $175,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetRACHEL'S NETWORK INC: $175,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $130,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMAD AGRICULTURE: $130,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $125,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetEQUITY TRUST INC: $110,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPLEIADES NETWORK INC: $105,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetPOTLIKKER CAPITAL: $100,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetYELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetConnecticut Farmland Trust Inc: $95,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJUBILEE JUSTICE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFOODSHED CAPITAL: $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC: $75,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetFlowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetUrban Tilth: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY AGRICULTURE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES: $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMeridian Institute: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTOMPKINS CONSERVATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $50,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetREWILD: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCivil Eats: $50,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BERRY CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE ELLIS ISLAND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetZERO FOODPRINT: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWolfe's Neck Farm Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTOMKAT RANCH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOccidental Arts and Ecology Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGRARIAN LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY SEED INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL'S NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAD AGRICULTURE ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEIADES NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds POTLIKKER CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHED CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds BLACK WOMEN IN ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND MARINE SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Flowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Urban Tilth ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY AGRICULTURE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Meridian Institute ↗
  • Who funds TOMPKINS CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds REWILD ↗
  • Who funds SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds Civil Eats ↗
  • Who funds THE BERRY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rsf Social Finance IncCA28.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Impactassetsinc · Clif Family Foundation · The Robert Stern Family Foundation · Community Foundation for San Benito County · The Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Tomkat Ranch Educational Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • City Seed Inc: 87% of income from government
  • Save Ellis Island Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yellow Farmhouse Education Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martha and Hunter Grubb’s filings →

More from the funding graph