Skip to content

· Public charity

The Marion I and Henry J Knott Scholarship Fund Inc

The fund's mission is to support certain tax exempt institutions in the state of maryland.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$536k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$11MHealth$1.3M
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $1,500,883, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,578,464 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,077,581 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$300,480
Median grant
1
States reached
$83M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVER$535,827
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND$514,576
MOUNT SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY$300,480
St Joseph Medical Center$50,000
Mercy Medical Center Inc$50,000
St Agnes Hospital Foundation$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $466k → 6%St Joseph Medical Center: $67k → 11%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY: $428k → 6%St Joseph Medical Center: $67k → 11%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND INC: $815k → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY: $300k → 6%St Joseph Medical Center: $50k → 11%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVER: $586k → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY: $281k → 6%St Joseph Medical Center: $50k → 11%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVER: $550k → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY: $261k → 6%ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50k → 11%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY: $549k → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $244k → 6%ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50k → 11%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVER: $536k → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $222k → 6%St Joseph Medical Center: $50k → 11%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND: $515k → 19%MOUNT SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY: $128k → 6%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVER: $514k → 19%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY: $500k → 19%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND: $466k → 19%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND: $456k → 19%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND INC: $427k → 19%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND: $417k → 19%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND INC: $389k → 19%NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVER: $288k → 19%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND: $224k → 19%BON SECOURS HOSPITAL BALTIMORE INC: $50k → 19%BON SECOURS HOSPITAL BALTIMORE INC: $50k → 19%Mercy Medical Center Inc: $67k → 19%Mercy Medical Center Inc: $67k → 19%Mercy Medical Center Inc: $50k → 19%MERCY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50k → 19%Mercy Medical Center Inc: $50k → 19%MERCY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $50k → 19%Mercy Medical Center Inc: $50k → 19%St Agnes Hospital Foundation: $67k → 19%St Agnes Hospital Foundation: $67k → 19%ST AGNES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%St Agnes Hospital Foundation: $50k → 19%St Agnes Hospital Foundation: $50k → 19%St Agnes Hospital Foundation: $50k → 19%ST AGNES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$12M
$0

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +20%
  • LU
    Loyola University Maryland Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +22%
  • MS
    MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +35%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC: $4,571,056 · EducationNOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INCMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $2,329,757 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INCLoyola University Maryland Inc: $3,708,977 · OtherLoyola University Maryland IncST AGNES FOUNDATION INC: $383,334 · HealthST AGNES FO…ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER INC: $383,334 · HealthST JOSEPH M…Mercy Medical Center: $383,334 · HealthMercy Medic…GRACE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthGRACE MEDIC…
    Education$6,900,813Other$3,708,977Health$1,250,002

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC: $4,571,056 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetLoyola University Maryland Inc: $3,708,977 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $2,329,757 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetST AGNES FOUNDATION INC: $383,334 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetMercy Medical Center: $383,334 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC ↗
    • Who funds Loyola University Maryland Inc ↗
    • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC ↗
    • Who funds ST AGNES FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds Mercy Medical Center ↗
    • Who funds GRACE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Marion I and Henry J Knott Scholarship Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marion I and Henry J Knott Scholarship Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
    • Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc: 1% of income from government
    • Loyola University Maryland Inc: 1% of income from government
    • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marion I and Henry J Knott Scholarship Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Marion I and Henry J Knott Scholarship Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marion I and Henry J Knott Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph