Skip to content
The Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$950k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$3.2MHealth$35kEnvironment$32kPublic Benefit$20kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $720k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
$20,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE WOLF SANCTUARY$65,000
WOLF MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY$60,000
PILOTS TO THE RESCUE$50,000
MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT$50,000
AWARE WILDLIFE CENTER$30,000
LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT$30,000
ORPHAN ACRES$30,000
REDSTONE HUSKY RESCUE$30,000
THE ASHER HOUSE LLC$25,000
MATCHDOG RESCUE$25,000
MISFIT SHEPHERDS INC$25,000
WOODY'S PLACE SR GERMAN SHEP SANCTU$25,000
PRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE$25,000
RED FEATHER EQUINE SANCTUARY$25,000
KEEPERS OF THE WILD$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ORPHAN ACRES: $30k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%ORPHAN ACRES: $20k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%ORPHAN ACRES: $15k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%ORPHAN ACRES: $8k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%ORPHAN ACRES: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 55 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
12

Total granted

$4.0M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

58%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $185k · revenue +93%
  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $152k · revenue +75%
  • PT
    PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • BC
    BIG CYPRESS GERMAN SHEPARD RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • BR
    BABY RHINO RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • LL
    LITTLE LONGEARS MINIATURE DONKEY RE
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
3
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
4
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
5
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
6
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
7
Lexis Legacy Animal Rescue
Religion
8
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
9
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
10
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
11
Angel Wing Acres Animal Welfare Soc Lombas
Animals
12
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Foundation for Rescued Animals Dba Tiger Creek Animal Sanctuary; the most unlike its peers is Newnan Coweta Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/42
Grantees still filing
27/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AWARE WILDLIFE CENTER: $810,000 · OtherAWARE WILDLIFE CENTERHUMANE SOCIETY OF COZUMEL: $105,000 · OtherHOMELESS PET FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherNOAH'S LOST ARC ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $90,000 · OtherWOODY'S PLACE SR GERMAN SHEP SANCTU: $75,000 · OtherGERMAN SHEPARD DOG RESCUE OF GEORGI: $70,000 · OtherCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $70,000 · Other+33 more: $737,000 · Other+33 moreWOLF MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY INC: $160,000 · AnimalsWOLF MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY INCLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $152,000 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INCPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $150,000 · AnimalsPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INCWHITE WOLF SANCTUARY: $140,000 · AnimalsWHITE WOLF SANCTUARYVETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $105,000 · AnimalsVETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDPRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE: $100,000 · AnimalsPRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGEAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $95,000 · AnimalsREDSTONE HUSKY RESCUE INC: $85,000 · AnimalsTHE ASHER HOUSE: $75,000 · AnimalsMatchdog Rescue: $75,000 · AnimalsCarter Reservoir Mustangs Inc Carter Reservoir Mustangs Registry: $75,000 · AnimalsKeepers of the Wild: $70,000 · AnimalsGEORGIA ANIMAL RESCUE DEFENSE INC: $70,000 · AnimalsGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $65,000 · Animals+14 more: $372,000 · Animals+14 moreMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $185,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE COZUMEL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyORPHAN ACRES INC: $78,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $10,000 · Public BenefitAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBirds Georgia Corporation: $10,000 · Environment
Other$2,057,000Animals$1,789,000Philanthropy$225,000Human Services$118,000Public Benefit$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $185,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWOLF MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY INC: $160,000 over 3y, 79% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $152,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWHITE WOLF SANCTUARY: $140,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetVETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $105,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetPRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE: $100,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $95,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetREDSTONE HUSKY RESCUE INC: $85,000 over 3y, 60% of budgetORPHAN ACRES INC: $78,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ASHER HOUSE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMatchdog Rescue: $75,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetCarter Reservoir Mustangs Inc Carter Reservoir Mustangs Registry: $75,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetKeepers of the Wild: $70,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNEWNAN COWETA HUMANE SOCIETY: $50,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetLAKE OCONEE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $48,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $43,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COZUMEL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED: $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE LIVES ANIMAL RESCUE: $30,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRED FEATHER FARM: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAnna L Haas Humane Society of Cobb County: $15,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetANGELS AMONG US RESCUE & BOARDING: $15,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWildcat Ridge Sanctuary: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIZZY'S LOVE EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WILDCAT SANCTUARY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBirds Georgia Corporation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCANINE PET RESCUE CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHAILES ANGELS PET RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFUREVER HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE WOLF SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds VETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds Animals' Angels Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds REDSTONE HUSKY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN ACRES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASHER HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Matchdog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds Carter Reservoir Mustangs Inc Carter Reservoir Mustangs Registry ↗
  • Who funds Keepers of the Wild ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA ANIMAL RESCUE DEFENSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
  • Who funds NEWNAN COWETA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE OCONEE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOGS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COZUMEL HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joyce a Ward Foundati…The Susan and Ford Sc…Surendra and Karen Gu…Seckinger Foundation …Amg Charitable Gift F…PC Fund for Animals C…Leslie L Alexander Fo…The Weill Family Foun…Bradford Family Found…Ratna Sabapathy Famil…The Edward E Hills Fu…Bernard Weinberg Foun…
Joyce a Ward FoundationCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · The Weill Family Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · Ratna Sabapathy Family Foundation I · The Edward E Hills Fund · Bernard Weinberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marianne H Halle Animal Suppor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home