Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$960kScience & Tech$675kHealth$525kHuman Services$116kInternational$100kPhilanthropy$60k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $380k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$100,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$100,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY$80,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID ADOM$50,000
MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY$50,000
THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND$10,000
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $60k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $800k · revenue +62%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $675k · revenue +168%
  • CA
    CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $66k · revenue +99%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Zichron Avrohom Yosef
    Philanthropy
    2
    Sherit Isroel
    —
    3
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

    To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

    Education
    4
    Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
    Philanthropy
    5
    Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

    Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

    —
    6
    Weizmann Institute of Science

    The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

    Science & Tech
    7
    Chesed Aharon
    Philanthropy
    8
    Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

    Education
    9
    Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
    Philanthropy
    10
    Torah Temimah Jerusalem

    The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

    Education
    11
    University of Judaism Foundation
    —
    12
    Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

    The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

    Science & Tech
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $675,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITU…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $160,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $800,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITYMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $350,000 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS EY…THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $175,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH…METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLIT…CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $66,000 · OtherTHE COUNCIL OF JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OF STATEN ISLAND: $60,000 · Other
    International$935,000Education$800,000Health$350,000Human Services$225,000Other$126,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $800,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $675,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $175,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $66,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch’s filings →

      More from the funding graph