Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

International$935kEducation$800kHealth$350kHuman Services$225kOther$126k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $380k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$100,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$100,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY$80,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID ADOM$50,000
MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY$50,000
THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND$10,000
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $60k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $800k · revenue +62%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $675k · revenue +17%
  • CA
    CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $66k · revenue +99%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Zichron Avrohom Yosef
    Philanthropy
    2
    Sherit Isroel
    3
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

    To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

    Education
    4
    Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
    Philanthropy
    5
    Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

    Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

    6
    Weizmann Institute of Science

    The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

    Science & Tech
    7
    Chesed Aharon
    Philanthropy
    8
    Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

    Education
    9
    Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
    Philanthropy
    10
    Torah Temimah Jerusalem

    The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

    Education
    11
    University of Judaism Foundation
    12
    Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

    The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

    Science & Tech

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc and the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $675,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITU…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $160,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $800,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITYMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY — $350,000 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS EY…THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND — $175,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH…METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY — $50,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLIT…CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC — $66,000 · OtherTHE COUNCIL OF JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OF STATEN ISLAND — $60,000 · Other
    International$935,000Education$800,000Health$350,000Human Services$225,000Other$126,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $800,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $675,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY — $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND — $175,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $160,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC — $66,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to The Margaret and Leo Meyer and Hans M Hirsch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph