Skip to content
The Mann Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Mann Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$876k
Granted FY2025still arriving
74
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$155k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$772kEducation$736kHealth$585kPhilanthropy$469kFood & Nutrition$418kInternational$309kHuman Services$286kReligion$91kOther$0
02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k48 grants · $157k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $299k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $420k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JDC$155,000
JDC (ISRAEL CAMPAIGN)$100,000
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$100,000
MOSES BROWN SCHOOL$65,000
GORDON SCHOOL$25,000
GORDON SCHOOL$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JEWISH COLORADO$20,000
THE TRIBE OF NOVA FOUNDATION$18,000
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
DENVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$11,000
SWIPE OUT HUNGER$10,000
RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$10,000
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%DENVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 10%DENVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10k → 21%DENVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10k → 21%DENVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $10k → 17%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $3k → 21%DENVER ACTIVE 20-30 CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%DENVER ACTIVE 20-30 CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%SWIPE OUT HUNGER: $10k → 14%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%SWIPE OUT HUNGER: $10k → 14%DEVELOPMENTAL ESSENTIAL SERVICES INC: $2k → 10%SWIPE OUT HUNGER: $10k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $10k → 17%SWIPE OUT HUNGER: $10k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $5k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $12k → 12%SWIPE OUT HUNGER: $10k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $5k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $10k → 12%SWIPE OUT HUNGER: $10k → 14%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $5k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $10k → 12%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $5k → 17%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $10k → 12%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $10k → 12%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $10k → 12%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $3k → 21%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 90 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

90 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
20

Total granted

$4.2M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+14%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $317k · revenue +85%
  • AR
    ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $208k · revenue +29%
  • TG
    The Gordon School
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BH
    BRADLEY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH - SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
10
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/82
Grantees still filing
58/82
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JDC: $520,000 · OtherJDCJEWISH ALLIANCE OF RI: $230,600 · OtherJEWISH ALLIANCE OF RIMOSES BROWN SCHOOL: $223,000 · OtherMOSES BROWN SCHOOLThe Gordon School: $185,000 · OtherThe Gordon SchoolJDC (ISRAEL CAMPAIGN): $155,000 · OtherJDC (ISRAEL CAMPAIGN)WOMEN'S FUND OF RI: $100,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $90,100 · OtherThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $120,000 · Other+59 more: $848,536 · Other+59 moreJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $316,875 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SN…ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $208,431 · Arts & CultureANDERSON RANCH A…Trinity Repertory Company: $43,500 · Arts & CultureTrinity Repertor…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $30,970 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $59,975 · Arts & Culture+8 moreRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $66,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $57,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $57,500 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC: $36,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $36,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $4,500 · Food & NutritionPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $80,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $72,972 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $35,000 · HealthPathfinders: $21,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $20,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $18,000 · Health+6 more: $18,465 · HealthCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $176,500 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $21,250 · EducationVALLEY SETTLEMENT: $18,500 · EducationMICHIGAN CULINARY ASSOCIATION INC: $12,464 · Education+3 more: $10,250 · EducationTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $62,000 · Human ServicesSWIPE OUT HUNGER: $60,000 · Human ServicesThe Denver Children's Foundation: $45,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $25,000 · Human ServicesDevelopmental Essential Services Inc: $16,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $55,360 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $35,000 · PhilanthropyASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColorado: $21,800 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,472,236Arts & Culture$659,751Food & Nutrition$300,000Health$286,437Education$283,964Human Services$252,500Philanthropy$249,160

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $316,875 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $208,431 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetThe Gordon School: $185,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $176,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDI'S HOUSE INC: $110,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $72,972 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $66,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $62,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSWIPE OUT HUNGER: $60,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $57,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $57,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $55,360 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Denver Children's Foundation: $45,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity Repertory Company: $43,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $42,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $37,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC: $36,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE: $36,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMOS HOUSE: $36,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN FOUNDATION: $31,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $30,970 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYAD EZRA: $30,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Jewish Center: $26,136 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN SCHOOL: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $21,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPathfinders: $21,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $21,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT: $19,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT: $18,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $17,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDevelopmental Essential Services Inc: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN CULINARY ASSOCIATION INC: $12,464 over 2y, 45% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Gordon School ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds SWIPE OUT HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Denver Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trinity Repertory Company ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds AMOS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Community Foundation …The Kresge FoundationRalph R Papitto & Bar…United Way of Rhode I…The Denver FoundationJewish Communal FundRose Community Founda…Colorado Gives Founda…The Rhode Island Comm…The Pearle W & Martin…The Aresty Family Fou…
Aspen Community FoundationCO19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Denver Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Pearle W & Martin M Silverstein Foundation · The Aresty Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mann Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mann Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Simmons University: 1% of income from government
  • Young Musicians Unite Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mann Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Mann Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mann Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home