Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mackey Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2019
10
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Education$155kArts & Culture$28kPublic Benefit$6kHuman Services$3kAnimals$750Food & Nutrition$750Crime & Legal$500Public Safety & Disaster$250Other$0
02FY2019 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $73k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR IUP$47,455
FRIENDS OF ROSE HILL CEMETERY$25,479
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$5,017
VFW POST 1989 INDIAN SPRINGS$3,000
INDIANA COUNTY K-9 UNIT$2,500
LEWISBURG AREA HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
NEW HOPE ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$2,500
AMERICA'S VET DOGS$250
BREAD FOR THE WORLD$250
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEW HOPE ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $3k → 14%NEW HOPE ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $500 → 14%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$107k · 4 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$107k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+22%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $99k · revenue -49%
  • LA
    LEWISBURG AREA HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k
  • NH
    NEW HOPE ASSISTANCE DOGS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • PS
    PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TA
    The AKC Humane Fund Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +217%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
2
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
3
Patriot Paws Service Dogs

To train and provide service dogs of the highest quality at no cost to disabled american veterans and others with mobile disabilities in order to help restore their physical and emotional independence.

Human Services
4
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
5
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services
8
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
9
Puppies Behind Bars Inc

Puppies behind bars trains incarcerated individuals to raise service dogs for wounded war veterans and first responders, facility dogs for police departments, and explosive-detecton canines for law enforcement.

Human Services
10
Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind Inc

The guide dog foundation for the blind, inc. provides guide and service dogs free of charge to provide increased independence, enhanced mobility, and companionship to people who are blind, visually impaired or have other disablities. the…

11
Operational K9 Medical Team of Wisconsin
Animals
12
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Akc Humane Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bread for the World Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP) — $99,450 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IU…PENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYFRIENDS OF ROSE HILL CEMETERY — $25,479 · OtherFRIENDS OF ROSE HILL CEMETERYVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS — $5,017 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARSLEWISBURG AREA HIGH SCHOOL — $3,500 · Other+5 more — $6,500 · Other+5 moreNEW HOPE ASSISTANCE DOGS INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesALICE PAUL HOUSE — $500 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $750 · Public BenefitThe AKC Humane Fund Inc — $500 · AnimalsAmerican Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation — $250 · AnimalsNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $250 · Health
Education$99,450Other$90,496Human Services$3,500Public Benefit$750Animals$750Health$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP) — $99,450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe AKC Humane Fund Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALICE PAUL HOUSE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBread For The World Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mackey Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mackey Family Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Mackey Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph