Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lyons Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$412kEducation$156kHealth$30kHuman Services$25kInternational$19kCivil Rights$13kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$217k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION ZWIHEL OF MONSEY$70,000
TOURO UNIVERSITY$15,372
YOUNG ISRAEL OF BOCA RATON$12,500
YAVNEH ACADEMY$5,000
GINDI MAIMONIDES ACADEMY$4,750
LOVE N GROCERIES$1,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN$1,000
ZICHRON SHLOMO$1,000
CHAI LIFE LINE$1,000
SHARSHERET$1,000
CONGREGATION OHAV SHALOM$800
EMUNAH OF AMERICA$500
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE TZEDE$360
GOKOSHER PROJECT$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AL KANFEI NISHARIM: $25k → 6%LOVE N GROCERIES: $1k → 14%KEREN ACHIEZER: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 32 repeat orgs$414k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
57

Total granted

$414k
$343k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+43%

Still filing today

22%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $54k · revenue +31%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +58%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +373%

Funded once

  • G
    GATEWAYS
    one grant, 2019 · $85k
  • PI
    PARDES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • PI
    PROJECT INSPIRE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
The Mikvah Ltd
Philanthropy
9
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
10
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
11
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
12
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Love N Groceries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GATEWAYS: $85,000 · OtherGATEWAYSCONGREGATION ZWEHIL OF MONSEY: $70,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZWEHIL OF MONSEYPARDES INC: $60,000 · OtherPARDES INCYAVNEH ACADEMY & TALMUD TORAH OF PATERSON: $39,700 · OtherYAVNEH ACADEMY & TALMUD TORAH OF PATERSONHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH: $34,000 · OtherHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACHYOUNG ISRAEL OF BOCA RATON: $33,763 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF BOCA RATONTOURO UNIVERSITY: $32,128 · OtherTOURO UNIVERSITYCONG BORO MINYAN INC: $24,750 · Other+60 more: $182,003 · Other+60 moreTHE JERUSALEM FUND INC: $52,941 · ReligionTHE JERUSALEM FUND I…PROJECT INSPIRE INC: $50,000 · ReligionPROJECT INSPIRE INCGindi Maimonides Academy: $44,350 · ReligionGindi Maimonides Aca…+5 more: $3,720 · ReligionYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $53,750 · Education+2 more: $1,350 · EducationAL KANFEI NISHARIM INC: $24,700 · Human ServicesLOVE N GROCERIES: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC: $19,140 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $3,720 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $1,990 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $5,420 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $500 · InternationalFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDAAS MEISHARIM: $1,000 · PhilanthropyEMUNAH CONNECTION INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$561,344Religion$151,011Education$55,100Human Services$26,200Health$25,350International$5,920Philanthropy$2,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $53,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JERUSALEM FUND INC: $52,941 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAL KANFEI NISHARIM INC: $24,700 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $19,140 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $5,420 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $3,720 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $1,990 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $1,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE N GROCERIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAAS MEISHARIM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeren Achiezer Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP MORASHA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMUNAH CONNECTION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMIKVAH CHANA INC: $360 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE JERUSALEM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT INSPIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Gindi Maimonides Academy ↗
  • Who funds AL KANFEI NISHARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY42.8× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Shavit Charitable Foundation · Cd Foundation · Fjc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Huberfeld Family Foundation · Charles & Rene Lipshitz Family Foundation · Joseph and Martha Melohn Tzedaka Fund · Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation · Kolatch Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lyons Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lyons Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lyons Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lyons Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lyons Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph