Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lutz Fund

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$157k
Granted FY2019
18
Grants FY2019
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Civil Rights$321kInternational$205kPublic Benefit$155kHealth$100kEnvironment$85kEducation$55kCrime & Legal$45kEmployment$6kOther$0
02FY2019 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
VOTE LATINO$10,000
NAACP$10,000
PEOPLE'S POWER AND LIGHT$10,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INCL PY CORRECT$10,000
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD$10,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FU$10,000
THOUSAND CURRENTS$10,000
ACLU$10,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS$10,000
350ORG$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$10,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$10,000
CHILDRENS DEFENSE FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $25k → 16%MEDICAL MISSION SISTERS: $25k → 22%THOUSAND CURRENTS: $25k → 10%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $25k → 17%350ORG: $50k → 20%RAINN: $100k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $10k → 18%PEOPLE'S POWER AND LIGHT: $10k → 14%NAACP: $35k → 19%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $10k → 16%SOCIETY OF CATHOLIC MEDICAL WORKERS: $6k → 22%THOUSAND CURRENTS: $20k → 10%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD: $25k → 17%350ORG: $25k → 20%CHILDRENS DEFENSE FUND: $25k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $10k → 18%PEOPLE'S POWER AND LIGHT: $10k → 14%NAACP: $20k → 19%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $10k → 16%MEDICAL MISSION SISTERS: $5k → 22%THOUSAND CURRENTS: $10k → 10%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD: $10k → 17%350ORG: $10k → 20%CHILDRENS DEFENSE FUND: $25k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $1k → 18%PEOPLE'S POWER AND LIGHT: $5k → 14%NAACP: $10k → 19%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS DEFENSE FUND: $10k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $10k → 17%FAIR ELECTIONS CENTER: $50k → 14%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $5k → 17%LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS: $50k → 14%NAACP LDF: $50k → 17%FAIR ELECTIONS CENTER: $25k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS: $10k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INCL PY CORRECT: $10k → 17%FAIR ELECTIONS CENTER: $10k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $10k → 17%ACLU: $25k → 17%ACLU: $20k → 17%ACLU: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$821k · 17 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$821k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+174%

Still filing today

65%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Civil RightsInternationalHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    Fair Elections Center
    3× · 2017–2019 · $85k · revenue ×31
  • CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +39%
  • TC
    THOUSAND CURRENTS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +378%

Funded once

  • Rape Abuse & Incest National Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +174%
  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +206%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
3
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
4
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
5
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
6
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
7
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
8
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
11
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAACP: $65,000 · OtherNAACPLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS: $60,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERSACLU: $55,000 · OtherACLUNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $45,000 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INCIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEDICAL MISSION SISTERS: $30,000 · OtherMEDICAL MISSION SISTERSPEOPLE'S POWER AND LIGHT: $25,000 · OtherPEOPLE'S POWER AND LIGHT+2 more: $15,799 · OtherFair Elections Center: $85,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections CenterCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $60,000 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUN…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & …Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $100,000 · HealthRape Abuse & Inc…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $45,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEAL…THOUSAND CURRENTS: $55,000 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURR…International Rescue Committee INC: $40,000 · InternationalInternational…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTER…350ORG: $85,000 · Environment350ORGEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $45,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $21,025 · Crime & LegalWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $55,000 · Education
Other$335,799Civil Rights$195,000Health$145,000International$120,000Environment$85,000Crime & Legal$66,025Education$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFair Elections Center: $85,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budget350ORG: $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $55,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $21,025 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lutz Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lutz Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lutz Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Lutz Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lutz’s filings →

More from the funding graph