Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lowndes Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$935k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Social Science$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.3MEducation$680kCommunity Improvement$480kScience & Tech$250kCivil Rights$170kCrime & Legal$150k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $845k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC$100,000
Palmetto Promise Institute$100,000
THE CLEMSON INSTITUTE$100,000
THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$75,000
CATO INSTITUTE$70,000
THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY$50,000
Institute of Humane Studies$50,000
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$50,000
MERCATUS CENTER$50,000
The Ludwig Von Mises Institute$50,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$50,000
Atlas Network$50,000
STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY$50,000
Judicial Watch$30,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $150k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50k → 14%THE LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE: $50k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC: $100k → 13%MERCATUS CENTER: $50k → 7%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $125k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50k → 14%The Ludwig Von Mises Institute: $50k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC: $100k → 13%MERCATUS CENTER: $50k → 7%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $75k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50k → 14%THE LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE: $50k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC: $100k → 13%MERCATUS CENTER: $50k → 7%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $75k → 10%The Ludwig Von Mises Institute: $50k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC: $90k → 13%INSTITUTE OF HUMANE STUDIES: $50k → 7%THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $75k → 10%THE LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE: $50k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC: $90k → 13%Institute of Humane Studies: $50k → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $80k → 14%Institute of Humane Studies: $50k → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $80k → 14%INSTITUTE OF HUMANE STUDIES: $45k → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $80k → 14%INSTITUTE OF HUMANE STUDIES: $45k → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $70k → 14%CATO INSTITUTE: $70k → 14%Atlas Network: $50k → 7%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ATLAS NETWORK: $50k → 7%THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY: $50k → 14%ATLAS NETWORK: $50k → 7%Atlas Network: $50k → 7%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ATLAS NETWORK: $50k → 7%THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY: $50k → 14%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY: $50k → 14%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $50k → 7%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $50k → 7%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $50k → 7%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $50k → 7%STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY: $50k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$4.3M
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitHealthEducationSocial ScienceCivil RightsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +58%
  • PP
    Palmetto Promise Institute
    5× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +97%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $380k · revenue +93%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

    The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

    Social Science
    2
    The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

    To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

    International
    3
    International Republican Institute

    Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

    Education
    4
    Frontiers of Freedom Institute

    To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

    Public Benefit
    5
    The Libertarian Institute

    Disseminate information and education about pertinent economic, social and governmental topics, via print, web and other media to educate the public about the principles of LIbertarianism.

    Education
    6
    Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

    The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

    Public Benefit
    7
    Institute for Strategic Dialogue-Us

    Isd-us is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to defending democracy and individual rights against threats to public safety and national security. isd-us is at the forefront of analyzing and innovating solutions…

    Education
    8
    Institute of Politics Policy and History
    Education
    9
    Ulysses S Grant Institute for the Study of Democracy

    The ulysses s. grant institute for the study of democracy promotes rigorous and objective study and analysis of the american democratic process.

    Civil Rights
    10
    Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

    The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

    Social Science
    11
    Independence Institute

    The mission of independence institute is to empower individuals and to educate citizens,legislators and opinion makers about public policies that enhance personal and economic freedom.

    Public Benefit
    12
    Open Markets Institute

    The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Palmetto Promise Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    12/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $500,000 · OtherTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTEFOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC: $480,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR ECONOMICTHE CLEMSON INSTITUTE: $450,000 · OtherTHE CLEMSON INSTITUTELUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $250,000 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INCATLAS NETWORK: $250,000 · OtherATLAS NETWORKInstitute for Humane Studies: $240,000 · OtherInstitute for Humane StudiesTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $170,000 · OtherTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIESSC PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherCATO INSTITUTE: $380,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTETHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $230,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDA…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $140,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $250,000 · EducationSTUDENTS FO…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $190,000 · EducationHILLSDALE C…Palmetto Promise Institute: $400,000 · HealthPalmetto P…Mercatus Center Inc: $200,000 · Social ScienceINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $150,000 · Civil RightsUS TERM LIMITS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Science & Tech
    Other$2,465,000Public Benefit$750,000Education$440,000Health$400,000Social Science$200,000Civil Rights$150,000Science & Tech$55,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $500,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetPalmetto Promise Institute: $400,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $380,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $250,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $240,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $230,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $190,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $170,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUS TERM LIMITS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
    • Who funds Palmetto Promise Institute ↗
    • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
    • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
    • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
    • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
    • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗
    • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
    • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
    • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
    • Who funds US TERM LIMITS FOUNDATION ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Lowndes Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lowndes Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Lowndes Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to The Lowndes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Lowndes’ filings →

      More from the funding graph