· Private foundation
The Love Tank Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
| VICKSBURG WARREN HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| STONE COUNTY SPCA | $1,000 |
| RAINBOW FARMS RIDING CENTER | $1,000 |
| WARREN COUNTY CHILDRENS SHELTER | $1,000 |
| GALILEE BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,000 |
| TRIUMPH CHURCH FOOD PANTRY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| HAVEN HOUSE FAMILY SHELTER | $1,000 |
| JACOBS LADDER | $500 |
| BEAUTIFUL DELIVERANCE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -31% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VHVICKSBURG-WARREN HUMANE SOCIETY9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +5%
- OCOKTIBBEHA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +143%
- JLJACOB'S LADDER LEARNING CENTER INC2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- RFRAINBOW FARMS INCone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -31%
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN MEALS ON WHEELSone grant, 2024 · $1k
- HFHABITAT FOR HORSES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal shelter and rescue
Shelter & loving care for strays
To spay and neuter animals and provide shelter
To help rescue unwanted pets
To take in stray and abandoned cats and care for their medical and shelter needs until they can be adopted by the public.
To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
Providing supportive care to homeless animals, help companion animals find new homes.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
The van wert county humane society is committed to building a community of responsible pet owners and ending animal cruelty; to offering a safe haven for animals in need; and to attempt through all reasonable avenues to return animals to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oktibbeha County Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center for Pregnancy Choices. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VICKSBURG-WARREN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds OKTIBBEHA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUTIFUL DELIVERANCE ↗
- Who funds JACOB'S LADDER LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Steve and Melody Golding Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Love Tank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Love Tank Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Love Tank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.