Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Louvin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$257kInternational$218kEducation$89kHuman Services$77kReligion$65kRecreation & Sports$35kYouth Development$28kAnimals$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCATION FOUNDATION- BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$50,000
MONTANA RESCUE MISSION$25,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY$12,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY$10,000
FAITH EVANGELICAL CHURCH$10,000
CHILD BRIDGE INC$7,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$7,500
FAMILY SERVICE$7,500
TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC$5,000
YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
YELLOWSTONE RIVER PARKS ASSOCIATION$2,500
BILLINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,500
BIKENET DBA BILLINGS TRAILNET$2,500
ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILD BRIDGE INC: $8k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE INC: $5k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE INC: $3k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE INC: $3k → 18%TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $5k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $4k → 9%TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $3k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA INC: $2k → 9%ST JOHN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$730k · 15 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$730k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-14%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MONTANA RESCUE MISSION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $135k · revenue +63%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MID YELLOWSTONE VALLEY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $68k · revenue +120%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $54k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St John's Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -14%
  • MC
    MT CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS STUDENTS
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yellowstone County Assistance Network

To empower people living in the big horn basin of wyoming to enhance health and employment status, overcome obsticales, and end economic hardship.

Human Services
2
Yellowstone Boys & Girls Ranch

Caring people, preparing youth for life.

Health
3
Mountain Home Montana Inc

To provide a safe, stable , and nurturing home where young mothers can discover their strengths, and their children can experience the joys of childhood.

Human Services
4
Yellowstone Casa Inc

Yellowstone casa is a non-profit organization whose mission is to train and provide volunteers to represent the interests of abused and neglected children in the yellowstone county court system. these court appointed special advocate…

Crime & Legal
5
Yellowstone Behavioral Health

Provide quality mental health services to residents of park county

—
6
Watson Children's Shelter Inc

Watson children's shelter is dedicated to providing a safe, nurturing, environment for children who have experienced abuse, neglect, abandonment or family crisis.

Human Services
7
Yellowstone Womens First Step House Inc

Established in 1997, Yellowstone Recovery was founded to provide a place and a plan for indigent men and women who suffer from the diseases of alcoholism and/or drug addiction. Our primary purpose is to help men and women achieve sobriety.

Housing & Shelter
8
Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc

Family promise of gallatin valley in montana is a non-profit organization working with our community to develop comprehensive, holistic solutions for families facing homelessness. we provide prevention services before families reach a…

Human Services
9
United Way of Yellowstone County Inc

To address the needs of yellowstone county and to improve lives by connecting and collaborating for a thriving community.

Philanthropy
10
Habitat for Humanity Missoula Inc

Habitat for humanity of missoula is a nonprofit, ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to the elimination of poverty housing in our community and throughout the world.

—
11
Partnership for Children

To provide therapeutic care and support for the safe and healthy development of children and families.

Human Services
12
Yellowstone Wildlife Sanctuary

Providing lifelong sanctuary to non-releasable greater yellowstone ecosystem wildlife while providing a message of education and conservation.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Head Start Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yellowstone River Parks Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $205,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHMONTANA RESCUE MISSION: $135,000 · OtherMONTANA RESCUE MISSIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MID YELLOWSTONE VALLEY: $67,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MID YELLOWSTONE VALLEYFAITH EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherFAITH EVANGELICAL CHURCHEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 · OtherEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLSBILLINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · Other+2 more: $12,500 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE: $30,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SER…ANGELAS PIAZZA INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesANGELAS PI…CHILD BRIDGE INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesCHILD BRID…TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTUMBLEWEED…St John's Foundation: $3,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY: $54,000 · HealthYELLOWSTONE RIVER PARKS ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · EnvironmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentYELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER: $18,500 · AnimalsHEAD START INC: $18,000 · EducationRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$556,000Human Services$76,500Health$54,000Environment$35,000Youth Development$27,500Animals$18,500Education$18,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTANA RESCUE MISSION: $135,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MID YELLOWSTONE VALLEY: $67,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY: $54,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetYELLOWSTONE RIVER PARKS ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY: $27,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBILLINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER: $18,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHEAD START INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANGELAS PIAZZA INC: $18,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCHILD BRIDGE INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSt John's Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTANA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MID YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE RIVER PARKS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BILLINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds HEAD START INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELAS PIAZZA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD BRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds St John's Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT34.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Montana Community Foundation Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Donald & Carol Roberts Foundation in Memory of Virginia K Weston Inc · Sample Foundation Inc · Mkm Foundation Inc · Brosovich Family Foundation · Billings Community Foundation · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Louvin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Louvin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Louvin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Louvin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louvin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph