Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Louie Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$44kEducation$39kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$9kReligion$8kCivil Rights$7k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$171k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SOCAL$10,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS DAYS OF DIALOGUE$5,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES 1871 MEMORIAL$5,000
LINCOLN HEIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT$4,000
CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$3,400
NY WOMEN IN FILMTV WOMENS FILM PRES$2,500
FRIENDS OF THE CHINATOWN LIBRARY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GUM MOON WOMENS RESIDENCE: $500 → 10%GUM MOON WOMEN'S RESIDENCE: $500 → 10%GUM MOON WOMEN'S RESIDENCE: $500 → 10%CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $5k → 14%CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $3k → 14%CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $3k → 14%CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $3k → 14%CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Louie Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Louie Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$135k · 12 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$135k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+29%

Still filing today

42%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Lincoln Heights Education Project Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHINATOWN LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +929%
  • TF
    THE FOOD BASKET INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • BC
    BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -16%
  • PC
    Pasadena City College Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +434%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central California Asian Pacific Women

To prepare and empower Asian and Pacific Island women from the Central Valley to advocate for gender and social justice by supporting and providing leadership and mentoring opportunities in the Central Valley and beyond.

Arts & Culture
2
Save Cantonese

Save Cantonese is an international movement that sustains and celebrates Cantonese language and culture. We have three Strategic Aims: a) protect and strengthen educational and research infrastructure for the Cantonese language, b) affirm…

Arts & Culture
3
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
4
Chinese Historical and Cultural Project

Promote, Educate, and Preserve Chinese and Chinese American history and culture in the Santa Clara County. In addition to the care and sharing of the Chinese American Historical Museum (CAHM) in the Ng Shing Gung building at History Park…

Arts & Culture
5
Asian American Art & Culture Initiative

Asian American Art & Culture Initiative is an organization promotes Asian art, culture and history through various programs, such as exhibition, contemporary art work and history/art workshops.

Arts & Culture
6
Chinese University Alumni Association of Southern California Center for Edu
Education
7
Foundation for Chinese Cultural Heritage
Philanthropy
8
North American Chinese Educational Foundation

The mission of North American Chinese Educational Foundation is to pool its resources and expertise to improve Chinese community educational excellence.

Youth Development
9
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
10
California Institute of Contemporary Art
11
Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundationinc

Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundation, Inc. ("FFOF") was established by five alumni from Fudan Fuzhong, the high school affiliated with Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Fudan University is one of the leading institutes of higher education…

Education
12
San Fernando Valley Chinese Cultural Association

The san fernando valley chinese cultural association (sfvcca) is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to the preservation and celebration of the splendors of chinese civilization. sfvcca is deeply committed to promoting nutual…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pasadena City College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Catalyst San Gabriel Valley Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SOCAL — $20,000 · OtherCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SOCALCHINATOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SO — $10,675 · OtherCHINATOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SOCOMMUNITY PARTNERS DAYS OF DIALOGUE — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS DAYS OF DIALOGUECOMMUNITY INITIATIVES 1871 MEMORIAL — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES 1871 MEMORIALIndividual grant recipient — $7,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOS ANGELES C A C A COMMUNITY ACTION — $6,900 · OtherLOS ANGELES C A C A COMMUNITY ACTIONCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SO CA — $6,250 · OtherCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SO CANY WOMEN IN FILMTV WOMENS FILM PRES — $2,500 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherLincoln Heights Education Project Inc — $20,200 · EducationLincoln Heights Education Proj…FRIENDS OF THE CHINATOWN LIBRARY — $16,850 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE CHINATOWN LIBRA…+2 more — $2,000 · EducationCATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY INCORPORATED — $15,982 · Human ServicesCATALYST SAN …Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall — $1,500 · Human ServicesWomens Divisi…THE FOOD BASKET INC — $9,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$74,425Education$39,050Human Services$17,482Food & Nutrition$9,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLincoln Heights Education Project Inc — $20,200 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHINATOWN LIBRARY — $16,850 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetCATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY INCORPORATED — $15,982 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena City College Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lincoln Heights Education Project Inc
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHINATOWN LIBRARY
  • Who funds CATALYST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM
  • Who funds Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Pasadena City College Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Louie Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Louie Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Louie Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph