Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Loretta a Snell Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$214kEducation$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kHuman Services$20kHousing & Shelter$14kInternational$12kReligion$5kEnvironment$300
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$331k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CECILIA CATHOLIC CHURCH FOOD KITCHEN$10,000
OAK CREST CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$5,000
HEREFORD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE ASSOC$3,000
BENEDICTINE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE CITY$3,000
WELCOME ONE HOMELESS SHELTER$1,000
OUR LADY OF GRACE OUTREACH$1,000
FRANCISCAN CENTER$1,000
BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE PAR FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRANCISAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISAN CENTER: $2k → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER: $1k → 19%UNITED CHURCHES ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 9 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$243k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+172%
+397%

Still filing today

22%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CECILIA'S SOUP KITCHEN
    5× · 2017–2021 · $105k
  • SC
    ST CECILIA FOOD KITCHEN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF GRACE OUTREAC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $36k

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF CHIPATA ZAMBIA
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
  • CA
    CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ZAMBIA
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • UC
    UNITED CHURCHES ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST CECILIA'S SOUP KITCHEN: $105,102 · OtherST CECILIA'S SOUP KITCHENST CECILIA FOOD KITCHEN: $50,000 · OtherST CECILIA FOOD KITCHENOUR LADY OF GRACE OUTREAC: $35,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF GRACE OUTREACDIOCESE OF CHIPATA ZAMBIA: $26,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF CHIPATA ZAMBIAWELCOME ONE HOMELESS SHELTER: $12,500 · OtherCATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ZAMBIA: $11,500 · OtherST CECILIA CATHOLIC CHURCH FOOD KITCHEN: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $40,298 · Other+12 moreFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesUNITED CHURCHES ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEREFORD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE ASSOC INC DBA MONKTON VOL EMERGENCY SERVICES: $7,000 · HealthYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$290,900Human Services$20,000Health$7,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHEREFORD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE ASSOC INC DBA MONKTON VOL EMERGENCY SERVICES: $7,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBENEDICTINE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE CITY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEREFORD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE ASSOC INC DBA MONKTON VOL EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHURCHES ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Loretta a Snell Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Loretta a Snell Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Franciscan Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Loretta a Snell’s filings →

More from the funding graph