Skip to content
The Loddie Naymola Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Loddie Naymola Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$410k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$6.4MHealth$142kHousing & Shelter$100kHuman Services$18kArts & Culture$15kYouth Development$5kAnimals$500
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$69k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$300,000
TEXAS ETA HOUSING CORP - SFA PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY$100,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GRACE AND HOPE FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%FRIENDS OF VAIL INC: $20k → 8%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $100k → 16%NECHES RIVER FESTIVAL: $4k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2.1M → 23%NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 13%CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $400 → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $15k → 16%NECHES RIVER FESTIVAL: $3k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 23%NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $10k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 23%NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 13%CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500k → 23%NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC: $622 → 13%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $1k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $333k → 23%GARTH HOUSE MICKEY MEHAFFY: $3k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $300k → 23%ART MUSEUM OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $3k → 19%STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 23%ART AND MUSEUM OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $3k → 19%TEXAS ETA HOUSING CORP - SFA PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY: $100k → 23%GARTH HOUSE MICKEY MEHAFFY: $2k → 19%GARTH HOUSE MICKEY MEHAFFY: $1k → 19%GARTH HOUSE MICKEY MEHAFFY: $1k → 19%RICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $500 → 19%HAZEL & FLOYD MACK SCOUT FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%SYMPHONY LEAGUE OF BEAUMONT: $1k → 19%JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE FREE: $1k → 19%ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $1k → 19%JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE FREE: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 10 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$6.6M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+17%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $6.4M
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    4× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +67%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $8k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF VAIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +17%
  • GA
    GRACE AND HOPE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • HA
    HAZEL AND FLOYD MACK SCOUT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
2
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
4
The Beaumont Children's Museum

Ignite the growth of children, families and communities through interactive learning.

Arts & Culture
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
7
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
8
Scott & White Clinic

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
12
Texas Chapter of the American College of Cardiology

The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baylor College of Medicine; the most unlike its peers is Pug Hearts Houston Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,414,999 · OtherSTEPHEN F AUSTIN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+8 more: $130,980 · OtherBaylor College of Medicine: $130,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF VAIL INC: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationNECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureArt Museum of Southeast Texas: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC: $8,448 · HealthRICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 · HealthHAZEL AND FLOYD MACK SCOUT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentPUG HEARTS HOUSTON RESCUE: $500 · Animals
Other$6,545,979Education$153,000Arts & Culture$11,000Health$9,348Youth Development$5,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF VAIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetNATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC: $8,448 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetArt Museum of Southeast Texas: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAZEL AND FLOYD MACK SCOUT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSymphony League of Beaumont Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetClackamas Community College Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUG HEARTS HOUSTON RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Talley Bryan Foun…Mechia FoundationThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Talley Bryan FoundationNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Talley Bryan Foundation · Mechia Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Loddie Naymola Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Loddie Naymola Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Clackamas Community College Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Loddie Naymola Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Loddie Naymola Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Loddie Naymola’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home