Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lisa Frank Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$54kYouth Development$52kHuman Services$39kHealth$11kPhilanthropy$9kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$1kAnimals$450Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$27,000
SHE READY FOUNDATION$10,000
CRANBROOK SCHOOLS$5,000
GIRLS SCOUTS$4,000
MUSUEM OF CONTEMPORY ART$3,500
TU NIDITO$1,300
BENS BELLS$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$100
THE LOFT$90
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHE READY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SHE READY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SHE READY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$157k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+13%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SHE READY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +19%
  • TN
    TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +33%
  • BB
    BEN'S BELLS INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SP
    STEP PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TM
    TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $145
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Tucson Botanical Gardens

Tucson botanical gardens connects people with plants and nature through art, science, history and culture.

Environment
4
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
6
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
7
Arizona Theatre Company

ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.

Arts & Culture
8
Home Matters to Arizona

Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…

Housing & Shelter
9
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
10
Ymca of Southern Arizona

Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…

Human Services
11
Tucson Family Food Project Inc

The mission of the tucson family food project is to provide meals for children who are struggling with food insecurity, while teaching them how to cook food for themselves in their own homes.

Food & Nutrition
12
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FINE ARTS: $46,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FINE ARTSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $45,560 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCRANBROOK: $9,000 · OtherCRANBROOKCRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $5,000 · OtherGIRLS SCOUTS: $4,000 · Other+7 more: $9,560 · Other+7 moreSHE READY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Human ServicesSHE READY FOUNDATIONTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $7,800 · HealthBEN'S BELLS INC: $3,150 · HealthTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLOFT CINEMA INC FKA TUCSON CINEMA FOUNDATION INC: $790 · Arts & CultureCASA DE LOS NINOS: $1,750 · Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food Bank Inc: $1,350 · Food & NutritionHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $450 · AnimalsWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 · Environment
Other$119,620Human Services$35,000Health$10,950Arts & Culture$2,790Youth Development$1,750Food & Nutrition$1,350Animals$450Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHE READY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $7,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBEN'S BELLS INC: $3,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOFT CINEMA INC FKA TUCSON CINEMA FOUNDATION INC: $790 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHE READY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BEN'S BELLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Girls Chorus Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds LOFT CINEMA INC FKA TUCSON CINEMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Donald Pitt Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Ralph L Smith Foundation 13952400 · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lisa Frank Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lisa Frank Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lisa Frank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph